Search for: "Bull v. Bull" Results 341 - 360 of 3,236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2016, 1:37 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The purpose is not determine guilt or innocence, but to determine whether there is sufficient credible evidence to warrant a full investigation A recommendation against proceeding to an investigation is not necessarily the same as a finding of “innocence” Must state what evidence was reviewed Summarizes relevant interviews Includes the conclusions of the Inquiry The individuals against whom the allegation was… [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 10:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
James, University of South Carolina, Beaufort, SC (USA) Andrés Lira, El Colegio de México / Academia Mexicana de Historia (México) José Reinaldo de Lima Lopes, Universidad de Sao Paulo (Brazil) Marta Lorente, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain) Bianca Premo, Florida International University (USA) Carlos Ramos Núñez, Tribunal Constitucional de Perú / PUCP… [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 12:02 pm
In its complaint, filed by patent attorneys for Draper, the following claims are asserted: Count I: Vutec Motorized Projection Screen Model - LECTRIC I-C - Patent Infringement of United States Patent No. 6,532,109 Count II: Vutec Motorized Projection Screen Model - LECTRIC III-C - Patent Infringement of United States Patent No. 6,532,109 Count III: Vutec Motorized Projection Screen Model - LECTRIC II-e Patent Infringement of United States Patent No.… [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 10:34 am
The claims listed in Agler's complaint were: Count I: Federal Unfair Competition and False Designation of Origin Count II: Federal Trademark Infringement Count III: Federal Trademark Counterfeiting Count IV: Common Law Unfair Competition and Trademark Infringement Count V: Unjust Enrichment Count VI: Conversion Count VII: Deception Count VIII: Indiana Crime… [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 1:50 pm
Count III: Common Law Unfair Competition Count IV: Unjust Enrichment Count V: Right of Publicity Infringement Under Cal. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:27 am
In the complaint, filed by Indiana intellectual property lawyers for Agler, the following counts are alleged: Count I: Federal Unfair Competition and False Designation of Origin Count II: Federal Trademark Infringement Count III: Federal Trademark Counterfeiting Count IV: Common Law Unfair Competition and Trademark Infringement Count V: Unjust Enrichment Count VI: Conversion Count… [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:16 pm by Patent Docs
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 4:44 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Bearing the burden: Environmental injustice in the protection of the Polar Bear: Alaska Oil & Gas Ass’n v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 9:41 pm
His neck became entrapped in the enclosure's rails, which had folded into a V. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 4:31 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Gaming Compact – Approval) Kialegee Tribal Town v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 3:14 am
High Court (Chancery Division) Quest Advisors Ltd v McFeely & Anor [2009] EWHC 2651 (Ch) (22 October 2009) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Miller v Bull (Returning Officer of Herefordshire Council) & Ors [2009] EWHC 2640 (QB) (28 October 2009) Sir John Fitzgerald Ltd v Macarthur [2009] EWHC 2659 (QB) (28 October 2009) Source: www.bailii.org [...] [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:40 am
As an example of a Pretrial Conference Order, see the "Final Pretrial Conference Assignment Order" [pdf here] in Opposition No. 91264945 (Red Bull GmbH v. [read post]