Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2010, 4:32 pm
” In explaining why the Ticconi decision did not preclude summary judgment, the Court of Appeal noted that while not cited by the Ticconi court, Metzinger v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 10:38 am
B291120, the California Court of Appeals considered whether the required vehicle use exception to the coming and going rule applied.[1] Factual and procedural background Wyatt Savaikie was a 14-year-old boy who was crossing the street in a crosswalk in Santa Clarita, California on July 16, 2015, when he was struck and killed by Ralph Steger. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 4:24 am
Interestingly, the opinion says this was “an issue of first impression in this court”, which I assume refers to the California Court of Appeals in general, rather than this particular district of the Court of Appeals. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:51 pm
The sixth case, which for unknown reasons is not listed as a cross-referenced case on the Court’s online docket for Brinker, is Bradley v. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 6:55 am
The Minnegren case was weighed recently by the California Court of Appeals, Second Appellate District, Division Two. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 7:48 am
California. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 12:20 pm
As I explained in my past last May, in U.S. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 3:21 am
Byrd v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 1:04 pm
This was largely because the California Supreme Court ordered a hearing on the petitioner's claim under People v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 5:14 am
Sharp v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 6:41 am
Yesterday I attended and reported in detail on the Munich I Regional Court's preliminary-injunction hearing in Nokia v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 3:58 pm
Let's hope that wasn't because the Court of Appeal thought that more than one or two members of the California State Bar could benefit from its description of how not to practice law. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
There were 15 decisions from the various Courts of Appeal, a lower pace in than in prior years (there were 17 decisions, but two were depublished). [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:19 am
The district court granted the petition because of a Cunningham violation, but the state appealed, arguing that Cunningham was a new constitutional principle. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:05 pm
The Court then distinguished Douglas in Ross v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:31 am
The Court then distinguished Douglas in Ross v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:26 am
Apple's lead counsel before the Karlsruhe-based appeals court is Dr. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 7:56 am
The defendant also had two medical marijuana cards from California in his wallet. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:33 pm
We express no view on whether damagesshould be enhanced or, if so, by what amountNote also footnote 1:Although Polara noticed a cross-appeal from certaindeterminations of the district court, it has not pursuedthose issues in its briefing before this court.Accordingly, Polara has not properly raised any issue oncross-appeal, and we need not address the cross-appeal. [read post]
