Search for: "Citizens v. Board of Elections"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
. 'Graduates will be well prepared … to embrace 24/7 government tracking and social credit systems,” one commenter on the Slashdot message board said. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:36 pm
The City of Sacramento received an early Christmas present with the December 18 publication of the Third District Court of Appeal’s opinion in Citizens for Positive Growth & Preservation v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Board of Education (1954) carried the day, or do you think Raoul Berger had the better argument in his book, “Government by Judiciary” (1977), in which he argued that Bickel’s historical defense was untenable? [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 11:16 am
Qualifications: Applicants must be United States citizens and enrolled in law school at the time of the internship. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Elections Posted by Michael Sozan, Center for American Progress, on Friday, December 6, 2019 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:05 pm
Qualifications: Applicants must be United States citizens and enrolled in law school at the time of the internship. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:03 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection The European Data Protection Board had a news piece on the “Sixteenth EDPB Plenary Session”. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 9:43 am
We do not think that a White House meeting is an “official act” under McDonnell v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
In Gill v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 11:38 am
In Mitchell v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 5:58 pm
Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty. (1968) Garcetti v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
He has been charged with lying to Congress and trying to tamper with a witness during a congressional investigation into interference in the 2016 election. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 6:05 am
It gave us as librarians and as citizens and a place where we could ask for permission to use these works. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 12:26 pm
News Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.html This week, in brief:National Congress of American Indians heads into election season after major changesOil company agrees to retire Badger-Two Medicine leaseTribal officials tell Oklahoma lawmakers Medicaid expansion would help their citizensYantkon Sioux: 'Our community is literally drowning'Coquille citizen Bridgett Wheeler named to Oregon Board of Education 'I don't think… [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 6:54 am
Justice John Paul Stevens explained his standpoint clearly in a dissent in Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 8:21 pm
Citing the Supreme Court of Canada in Baier v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
The leading decision is that of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Davison v Randall (2019) In that case, the Chair of the Board of Supervisors of Loudoun County, Virginia, Ms. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 5:57 am
The US Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
These philosophies also found their way into the controversial 2010 SCOTUS decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
