Search for: "Clayton " Results 341 - 360 of 4,966
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2022, 9:04 am by Stephen Honig
  Citing the FTC Act which bars “unfair method of competition,” broader if less precise than the prohibitions of the anti-trust laws (Sherman and  Clayton Acts), the policy purports to criminalize a wide range of ill-defined actions: conduct that is coercive, collusive, deceptive, involves use of economic power, action “otherwise restrictive or exclusionary,” or which “tends to negatively affect competitive conditions” or limit consumer choice. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 3:30 am by Anne Marie Lofaso
Clayton County, which held that it is unlawful for employers to fire individuals merely because they are gay or transgender, to raise several points about the Court’s favorite interpretative tool, textualism. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 5:14 am by Unknown
Cornerstone’s report said this represented an increase over FY21 of 28 percent but also suggested that the increase in FY22 versus rates for the most recent three SEC chairs fell in the middle, with the Clayton-era SEC bringing fewer cases then the Gensler-era SEC and the Mary Jo White-era SEC bringing more cases than the Gensler-era SEC.A heat map diagram included in the Cornerstone report indicated that the most common type of enforcement action involved reporting and disclosure… [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 3:15 am by Liz Dunshee
Here’s the 4-year Strategic Plan published by former SEC Chair Jay Clayton in 2018, which shared a few similar themes. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
 Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 21 November 2022, judgment was handed down in Wellington v Metcalf [2022] VCC 1759 by Clayton J. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 11:44 am by Alden Abbott
[This post is a contribution to Truth on the Market‘s continuing digital symposium “FTC Rulemaking on Unfair Methods of Competition. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:09 am by Michael C. Dorf
Clayton County, the Supreme Court held that Title VII's prohibition on workplace sex discrimination encompasses a prohibition on workplace discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am by David Kopel
Michigan J. of Law Reform 175 (2013) (with Clayton Cramer and Joseph Olson). [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
" Methodology I started with the Appendix to Clayton E. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 11:47 am by Steven J Cernak
Most of the seven pages the guidance spends on its historical review is dedicated to showing that the FTC’s standalone authority extends beyond the Sherman and Clayton Acts. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Rogers College of Law), Clayton Morrison (University of Arizona - School of Information), Derek E. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 9:05 pm by Zoe Stern
Clayton County, which held that sex discrimination encompasses gender identity and sexual orientation discrimination. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 8:09 am by Dirk Auer
Supreme Court: Consistent with the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the FTC Act in at least twelve decisions, this statement makes clear that Section 5 reaches beyond the Sherman and Clayton Acts to encompass various types of unfair conduct that tend to negatively affect competitive conditions. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 10:50 am by Eric C. Chaffee
Clayton, How Public Pension Plans Have Shaped Private Equity, 81 Md. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 4:18 pm by Leo Caseria and Malika Levarlet
” The Statement asserts that, in enacting Section 5, Congress’s objective was to create a new prohibition broader than, and different from, the Sherman and Clayton Acts. [read post]
” The Statement asserts that, in enacting Section 5, Congress’s objective was to create a new prohibition broader than, and different from, the Sherman and Clayton Acts. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 1:22 pm by Jonathan M. Barnett
Reengineering Section 5 of the FTC Act as a “shadow” antitrust statute that operates outside the rule of reason (or any other constraining objective principle) provides a strategic detour around the inconvenient evidentiary and other legal obstacles that the agency would struggle to overcome when seeking to achieve these policy objectives under the Sherman and Clayton Acts. [read post]