Search for: "DOES 1-100, exclusive"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,950
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2018, 6:38 am
European patent No. 1 773 302, filed on 16 February 2005 and claiming the priority date of 23 July 2004 from US application 10/898061 (D1), was opposed on the ground that its subject-matter lacked novelty and inventive step (Article 100(a) EPC) and was insufficiently disclosed (Article 100(b) EPC).The following documents were among those cited during the first-instance proceedings:D1: US2005/0152971 (application No. 10/898061), filed on 23 July 2004, priority application… [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 8:55 am
The Proposed Rule would apply to companies that file EEO-1 reports, with more than 100 employees, and hold federal contracts or subcontracts worth $50,000 or more for at least 30 days. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 3:19 pm
As of 1-1-2022 the exclusion has been increased to $16,000 per person per year. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 8:43 am
Yale’s 1474 becomes 100; the 75 I created for the bottom becomes 0. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 7:21 am
This is done by calculating the regular rate for 45 hours, or 45 hours x $8 ($360) plus the bonus of $100 ($460) divided by the total hours worked ($460 / 45 hours = $10.22). [read post]
6 May 2009, 2:43 pm
The law doescontain certain exclusions from the lead limits. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 8:33 am
Does this mean the price of each of the first 200 units will be increased by 1/200 of the application software fee? [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Idaho 1/1/19 FAGI FTI Illinois Rolling FTI FTI Indiana 1/1/19 FAGI FTI before NOLs and special deds. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 3:00 am
I have a few thoughts on the matter, which are entirely thoughts and not legal advice (in case anyone is inclined to take them in an improper context).1. [read post]
4 May 2023, 2:31 pm
Hostile or Warlike Exclusions On May 1, 2023, the New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division issued a ruling in the case of pharmaceutical giant, Merck, which was hit by NonPetya attack, which the U.S. government attributed to the Russian government. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 11:20 am
As for the implied FDA endorsement: (1) A coupon affixed to certain GSG containers described it as “the first and only formula brand made from 100% whey protein partially hydrolyzed, and that meets the criteria for a FDA Qualified Health Claim for atopic dermatitis. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 2:23 pm
” Not exactly groundbreaking, nevertheless simple does not equate to easy . [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 8:30 am
Although we have not yet had occasion to address Article III standing in a trademark case, our cases in the patent context have made clear that the statute does not set forth the exclusive test for standing when a decision of an administrative agency is appealed in federal court. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 8:07 am
§§ 213(d)(1)(A), 223(d)(2). [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 4:59 am
In May 2003 Sawyer told Atari he wanted to conduct an audit for the period 1 January 1999 to 31 March 2003, invoking the licence agreements. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:54 pm
Gray (1943) 22 Cal.2d 87, 100, 137 P.2d 9; see Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:58 am
So, it does seem to me that the same confluence of events may be happening again. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 8:04 am
There are two reasons for this: 1. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 10:24 am
” 1 Gary Born, International Commercial Arbitration 100 n.591 (2009). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:00 am
At minimum, the decision would bar any categorical exclusion of software patents. [read post]
