Search for: "Deal, et al v. Grant, et al" Results 341 - 360 of 994
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2008, 5:59 am
The Supreme Court has granted a petition to transfer the case and has assumed jurisdiction over the appeal. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 11:37 am by Eric
The Ninth Circuit denied the Councils' request on Nov. 6. * The Ninth Circuit order granting the en banc hearing * Fair Housing Councils' reply to the EFF et al amicus brief * EFF et al amicus brief supporting a rehearing en banc * Fair Housing Council's response to Roommates.com's request for an en banc rehearing * Roommates.com's En Banc Request * The original 2007 Ninth Circuit opinion * My blog post on the Ninth Circuit… [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 12:00 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Khouli et al and received a sentence of a $1000 fine.At Monday's ceremony repatriating the Assyrian head, ICE referred to a previous repatriation ceremony with Afghanistan that took place two years ago. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:01 pm by Howard Knopf
I have previously written about how Rogers et al are trying to get a refund of their “ringtone” payments made to SOCAN going back to 2003 in light of the SCC’s July 12, 2012 decision in ESA v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Merrill et al., Nat’l Research Coun- cil of the Nat’l Academies, A Patent System for the 21st Century 122 (2004). [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm by Florian Mueller
The order to dismiss the Qualcomm class action(s) came one day after Judge Corley also made a decision (in a class-action matter that does not involve Qualcomm but also followed an FTC action) relating in part to yours truly's communications with Microsoft: DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 11:45 am
  Mylan et al argued that the IPR could continue because Allergan was the "true owner of the challenged patents".Substance matters more than form and if the substance of the transaction has a party retaining all substantial rights under the patent, then they are a "patent owner" irrespective of whether the transaction characterizes them as such (see Waterman v Mackenzie (1891); Speedplay v Behop (2000); Alfred E Mann Foundation… [read post]