Search for: "Derring v. State"
Results 341 - 360
of 564
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2014, 1:45 am
"Wim van der Eijk observing howmuch the EPO empire has grownIPKat readers will note that Mr Justice Arnold has followed suit in his recent referrals, the Actavis v Sanofi judgment being one such instance. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:45 am
Against that background, the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Supreme Court of the Netherlands) decided to seek a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:35 am
United States. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 8:58 am
Nils Lund: “Der Rückgriff auf das nationale Recht zur europäisch-autonomen Auslegung normativer Tatbestandsmerkmale in der EuGVVO”– the English abstract reads as follows: The ECJ’s decision discussed in this article concerns two provisions of the Brussels I Regulation. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
Perry v Truefitt, 49 ER 749 stated that ‘A man is not to sell his own goods under pretence that they are the goods of another man. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 pm
Category: Priority By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor TitleEnOcean GMBH v. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 5:10 pm
Makeig v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In FDIC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In FDIC v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 5:11 am
Bey v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:05 pm
To be precise, seven decisions of Areios Pagos have applied the findings of the ECJ in the case FBTO Schadeverzekeringen NV v Jack Odenbreit. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 5:11 am
From Futurewei v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 11:30 am
Rather, it is the unavoidable result of the creation of a market because a market cannot exist without the promise of reward to owners of property who choose to place that property on the market.6 More recently, the Supreme Court has explicitly rejected this erroneous secondary consideration reasoning, reiterating the basic economic logic of copyright in Eldred v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
– San Miguel Brewing International Limited v. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 9:07 am
Jan von Hein: “The applicability of Art. 5 No. 3 Brussels I-Regulation to damages caused by multiple tortfeasors” In Melzer v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 12:06 am
Dieser kurze Beitrag untersucht, ob die Vereinigten Staaten durch das Abhören des Handys der Kanzlerin Regeln des Völkerrechts verletzt haben. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 7:11 am
Reply Brief Filed in United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 8:08 am
Over the last several years I have been considering the issue of corruption generally, --Soft Extra Territorialism and American Anti-Corruption Campaigns, Sept. 12, 2006; --Soft Extra Territorialism and Anti-Corruption Campaigns: On the Perverse Folly of Corrupt States, Sept. 15, 2006);--Rockwell International v. [read post]
