Search for: "District of Columbia v. Armes" Results 341 - 360 of 1,065
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2018, 12:32 pm by Quinta Jurecic
District Court for the District of Columbia had erred in requiring the government to provide 72-hours of notice before transferring a dual U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 12:15 pm
Because MSI fails to make a prima facie case of personal jurisdiction under the District of Columbia's long-arm statute, we too do not reach the issue of whether the exercise of personal jurisdiction over CCS in the District of Columbia comports with the requirements of dueprocess. . . . [read post]
31 May 2018, 12:01 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Baron’s essay challenges Scalia’s opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:23 pm by Harry Graver
Using its Article I powers to regulate the armed forces, Congress created the CMCR under the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA) as part of its response to the Supreme Court’s decision in Hamdan v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 6:32 pm by Karen Tani
The Supreme Court reaffirmed this tradition of “sensitive places” regulation in District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 6:38 am
I explored the question in my first published paper, Second Amendment Challenges to Student Housing Firearms Bans: The Strength of the Home Analogy.In that paper, I examine the United States Supreme Court decision, District of Columbia v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am by Tejinder Singh
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and then Chief Justice William Rehnquist on the Supreme Court. [read post]
2 May 2012, 6:29 pm by Larkin Reynolds
Tomorrow morning, a panel of three judges from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (Chief Judge Sentelle along with Circuit Judges Ginsburg and Kavanaugh) will hear argument in the case of Salim Hamdan v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 11:53 am by Mikhaila R. Fogel
District Court of the District of Columbia, ruled that Special Counsel Robert Mueller has the authority to prosecute Concord Management, a Russian company accused of participating in the conspiracy to hack Democratic Party organizations and release the stolen information to the public. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:17 am by Eugene Volokh
Those offenses included convictions for dealing in firearms and explosives without a license and unlawful transport and possession of machineguns.Pruess next argues that, after the Supreme Court’s decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 10:39 am by Lyle Denniston
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 2008. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:16 pm by David Kopel
Halbrook's book will be central to the Supreme Court case, just as Halbrook's previous work was for the Supreme Court's decisions in District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 4:55 pm
This past term, the Supreme Court, in the watershed decision of District of Columbia v. [read post]