Search for: "Doe Nos." Results 341 - 360 of 2,056
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2022, 1:22 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
The latest issue of the Journal of Conflict Resolution (Vol. 66, nos. 4-5, May 2022) is out. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 9:49 am by Jon Sands
§ 2254(d) does not govern the Atkins claim in this appeal.While the petitioner's appeal from the denial of his 1987 habeas petition was pending, the Supreme Court decided Atkins. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 9:09 am by Dennis Crouch
Patent Nos. 10,898,574, 10,702,600, and 10,933,127. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 3:08 am
Full agenda may be found here.February 28, 2018 - 11 AM: In re David Copeland-Smith, Serial Nos. 85498107 [Section 2(d) refusal of BEAST MODE SOCCER for "T-shirts" and "Sporting goods and equipment for soccer training, namely, balls. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 12:40 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
Badger, 5th DCA, Case Nos. 5D14-1145 and 5D14-3469 (2015)Follow @crubincrubin [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 11:19 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
A January 2015 post at biofuelsdigest contained the text:--On April 11, 2013, the Delaware District Court (District Court) entered a final judgment of non-infringement in Gevo’s favor following the acknowledgment by Butamax Advanced Biofuels LLC (Butamax) that Gevo does not infringe Butamax’s asserted patents under the District Court’s construction of a key claim term in Butamax’s Patent Nos. 7,851,188 and 7,993,889.At the time, Butamax appealed Gevo’s… [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:23 pm
"Unlike a toll, a suspension does not exclude its effective duration from the calculation of the relevant time period. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 5:32 am
PACER, the online platform containing federal docket entries and related documents, does not contain a Nature of Suit (NOS) code that captures all commercial cases. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:23 pm
"Unlike a toll, a suspension does not exclude its effective duration from the calculation of the relevant time period. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 3:12 am
In re NGD Homesharing, LLC, Serial Nos. 88452729 and 88454104 (March 18, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 6:25 am by Josh Sturtevant
Or, maybe more appropriately as I am asking rhetorically, how does one love America. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 4:08 am
October 18, 2022 - 1 PM: In re The New York Times Company, Serial Nos. 90106071, 90112154, 90112577, 90115155, 90115337, and 90115491 [Refusal to register the marks THE NEW OLD AGE, GOOD APPETITE, HUNGRY CITY, WORK FRIEND, LIKE A BOSS, and OFF THE SHELF for "columns on the subject of business, office, money, careers and worklife balance" and for "providing on-line publications in the nature of articles, columns" on the ground that the mark identifies only a portion of… [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:42 pm
§ 101, and then state that the sequence data are only nonfunctional descriptive material that does not contribute to the patentability of the claim under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 2:45 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
(Apple) does not infringe the asserted claims of U.S.Patent Nos. 6,574,267 (the ’267 patent) and 7,359,427 (the’427 patent). [read post]