Search for: "Doe v. Community Health Center, Inc." Results 341 - 360 of 488
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
 “A health care provider may not refer the employee to another health care provider, diagnostic facility, therapy center, or other facility without prior authorization from the carrier…. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Bartrip, Beyond the Factory Gates: Asbestos and Health in Twentieth Century America 77 & n.4 (2006); Peter W.J. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 3:23 am by Thornhill Law Firm, A PLC
“I’m concerned about ground-level offices and shopping centers and small businesses. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
In 2019, based on Rust, the Department of Health and Human Services instituted new referral and separation provisions. [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:04 pm by Guest Contributor
USDA can be reluctant to act and when it does, often takes a measured response that many argue is inadequate. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The Campaign Legal Center challenged the decision by Republican commissioners to close an investigation into Scott against the recommendation of the agency’s nonpartisan lawyers. [read post]
Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc., in which the Court said that states have a “legitimate interest in proper disposal of fetal remains. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
Sources: Management Science Associates Inc., state revenue departments, author calculations. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 7:45 am by Schachtman
  Our job is not to evaluate the use of post-hoc analysis in the scientific community; the FDA has already done so. [read post]