Search for: "Does 1-194"
Results 341 - 360
of 683
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm
§ 1396p(e)(1)). [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 1:36 pm
R.V., 933 S.W.2d 1, 6 (Tex. 1996). [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 9:32 am
Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 201 (2001). [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 10:43 am
Patterson, 194 N.C. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 10:10 pm
Complete text of bill is below, but here are the bullet points:Conditions covered - Cancer, AIDS or Parkinson's DiseasePhysician certifies its use.Potency "the specific concentrations of individual cannabinoids that must be present to treat the patient's condition," Limited to a 30-day supply.Dispensaries approved by county commissionFlorida Medical Marijuana - Complete Text of Proposed 2015 LawFlorida Senate - 2015 SB 528By Senator… [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
194. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 5:57 am
A summary of the case can be found at Part 1 of the series. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 5:57 am
A summary of the case can be found at Part 1 of the series. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 2:30 pm
LEXIS 849, 1, 2012 NY Slip Op 850, 1 (N.Y. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:59 am
A mere description of the content of work was, however, not protectable under Articles 5 (3), 15 (1, 2, 3 4) German Trade Mark Act, so that wetter.de’s claim failed. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 11:57 pm
It does not depend upon whether the belief turned out to be true or false. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 11:34 am
What Does This Mean for My Company? [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
We’ve made no secret of our distaste for the so called “heeding presumption” – that juries may presume that any alternative “adequate” warning would have been heeded by the plaintiff (or, in prescription medical product cases, the prescriber). [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:13 am
VK Vora[1], the Supreme Court observed that to be liable for the commission of an offence, a person should fulfill the legal requirement of being a person in law responsible for conduct of the business of the Company and also fulfill the factual requirement of being a person in charge of the business of the Company. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 8:32 am
Does the Court require a face-to-face confrontation with witnesses? [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
Read pp 74-81__________Inter-Systemic Harmonization And Its Challenges For The Legal-StateLarry Catá BackerHiiL Law of the Future Series, The Law of the Future and the Future of Law(Sam Muller, Stavros Zouridis, Laura Kistemaker and Morly Frishman, eds., The Hague, Netherlands: Torkel Opsahi Academic Editor, forthcoming 2011).1. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
This week the randomly selected blogs are 1. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 8:53 am
WDAS Broadcasting Station, 194 A. 631 (1937), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that state common law prevented the unauthorized broadcast of phonograph records (when the legend “Not Licensed for Radio Broadcast” was printed on the records); but in 1940, in RCA Mfg. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am
See also 1 S. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 8:23 am
This is because, while it is true that the data does not refer to the content of communications, it is also true that in many occasions [metadata] offers information about the circumstances in which the communication takes place, affecting directly or indirectly, the privacy of the communicants. [read post]
