Search for: "E. E.G. Y." Results 341 - 360 of 501
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm by Schachtman
Carl Cranor’s Conflicted Jeremiad Against Daubert It seems that authors who have the most intense and refractory conflicts of interest (COI) often fail to see their own conflicts and are the most vociferous critics of others for failing to identify COIs. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am by Guest Author
Recently, Louis Capozzi wrote that, “[e]ven before West Virginia, the major questions doctrine had garnered substantial criticism from academics. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 2:19 pm
" "Well y-e-s-s, it looks that way, but shouldn't we discuss it first with the parties? [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The material is so as to protect spectacles within the tube, e.g. wool or cotton, column 4, line 30. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 11:00 pm by Adam Wagner
The latter is a particular problem in relation to family law – see e.g. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 2:52 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
See, e.g., Matter of Lee, 11 I&N Dec. 601 (Comm. 1966)(“[b]y ceasing his temporary employment . . . the applicant terminated his lawful nonimmigrant status”) and compare Matter of Siffre, 14 I&N Dec. 444 (Comm. 1973)(“[in the case of a nonimmigrant who] has been admitted for a fixed period, within that period his stay is not unlawful unless by his own conduct he violates one of the conditions of his admission [emphasis added]). [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 2:52 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
See, e.g., Matter of Lee, 11 I&N Dec. 601 (Comm. 1966)(“[b]y ceasing his temporary employment . . . the applicant terminated his lawful nonimmigrant status”) and compare Matter of Siffre, 14 I&N Dec. 444 (Comm. 1973)(“[in the case of a nonimmigrant who] has been admitted for a fixed period, within that period his stay is not unlawful unless by his own conduct he violates one of the conditions of his admission [emphasis added]). [read post]
29 May 2012, 1:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
The order may well be factually unfounded, but if it were factually well-founded, and if “harass” were limited to telephone calls, e-mails, and the like to Kimberlin personally, then it would likely be constitutionally permissible. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 6:40 am by Kyle Dudek
First, as to Lewis’s preferred yardstick – which she labeled a “flexible, common-sense standard” – the court found it fatally “loos[e] [and] depart[ing] too dramatically from the essential sameness that is necessary to a preliminary determination that the plaintiff’s employer has engaged in unlawful ‘discrimination.'” Moreover, “[b]y permitting cases to proceed on the most meager showing of similarity between a… [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 5:35 am
E is for Environment - Negotiation of the environmental provisions or a side agreement will make headlines. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 9:40 pm
See, e.g., '676 Patent col.2 ll.27-31, col.4 ll.13-14, col.5 ll.13-14. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:55 pm by FDABlog HPM
  Although other UFAs, like PDUFA and BSUFA, include user fee waiver/refund provisions (e.g., small business waiver), as well as strict waiver/refund request timelines (i.e., requests must be submitted within 180 days after a fee is due), the proposed GDUFA statute does not. [read post]