Search for: "FEDEX GROUND " Results 341 - 360 of 365
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
: Nampak Cartons Ltd v Rapid Action Packaging Ltd (IPKat) (EPLAW)   United States US General New US IP enforcement plan may have international impact (IP Watch) US IP Enforcement Coordinator releases ‘2010 Joint Strategic Plan on Intellectual Property Enforcement’ (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Copyrights & Campaigns) (Public Knowledge) (Copyrights & Campaigns)   US Patent Reform Rader, Michel weigh in on the patent system and patent… [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:14 pm
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., 154 Cal.App.4th 1, 10-11, 64 Cal.Rptr.3d 327 (2007) court was apparently unaware of California Labor Code section 2750 - which it never mentioned - when it concluded that "[b]ecause the Labor Code does not expressly define ‘employee' for purposes of section 2802, the common law test of employment applies. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
: Nampak Cartons Ltd v Rapid Action Packaging Ltd (IPKat) (EPLAW) United States US General New US IP enforcement plan may have international impact (IP Watch) US IP Enforcement Coordinator releases ‘2010 Joint Strategic Plan on Intellectual Property Enforcement’ (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Copyrights & Campaigns) (Public Knowledge) (Copyrights & Campaigns) US Patent Reform Rader, Michel weigh in on the patent system and patent… [read post]
23 Dec 2006, 10:50 am
[UPDATE December 23: Due to the outcome of the first two bowl games, won convincingly by TCU and BYU of the Mountain West Conference, we now favor a win by New Mexico over San Jose State 27-20.]FIND BCS BOWL FACTS AT THIS LINK (Rose Bowl, FedEx Orange Bowl, Allstate Sugar Bowl, Tostitos Fiesta Bowl, Tostitos BCS National Championship GameOur predictions for the Bowl Games on or after January 1 follow:26. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 6:48 am
This post examines an opinion from the Oregon Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 8:17 pm by Riana Pfefferkorn
Well, the dreaded day has come: the EARN IT Act was formally introduced today in the Senate Judiciary Committee. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:30 pm by Satya Marar
On July 19, the District Court for the Northern District of California denied the FTC’s bid to enjoin Microsoft’s vertical acquisition of video game publisher Activision. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
Judge Garland was also part of a unanimous panel that upheld a Park Service regulation; the Supreme Court subsequently vacated the ruling on the ground that the suit was not ripe. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 2:08 am by Michael Ehline
Establish ground rules, such as no roughhousing, heated discussions, or anything else that might divert your attention away from the road. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 6:19 am by Michael Ehline
In 2008 in Louisiana, a train carrying hydrochloric acid derailed, spilling more than 10,000 gallons of harmful chemicals into the area and displacing thousands of people as they started to vacate their homes for safer grounds. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Oberoi, No. 044545 Conviction for mail fraud and health care fraud is affirmed over claims of error that defendant was denied a speedy trial in violation of the Speedy Trial Act on the grounds that: 1) the pre-indictment delay exceeded 30 days; and 2) the pretrial delay exceeded 70 days. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:42 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Justice was served in the sense that the dismissal was ultimately grounded on the legally correct principles, but 8 extra years of litigation is hardly justice being served. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The result is a near-complete division in the case law: when a political or religious plaintiff sues a political or religious defendant for trademark infringement, it can often win, whereas a commercial actor that sues a political actor will often lose on the ground that the Lanham Act simply doesn’t apply to the political actor’s speech. [read post]
On this note, Cohen’s opening testimony describes an exchange with Trump in the Oval Office in February 2017 in which Trump assures him that his reimbursement checks are on their way:  “They were FedExed from New York,” Cohen paraphrases him as saying, “and it takes a while for that to get through the White House system. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
We've done so many posts on removal - for you non-lawyers that means moving cases that were originally filed in state court into federal court - that even we have a hard time keeping track. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
After Stevens What will the Supreme Court be like without its liberal leader? … [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
What will the Supreme Court be like without its liberal leader? [read post]