Search for: "Failing v. Failing" Results 341 - 360 of 98,496
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Apparently, they failed to address the plaintiff’s claim that the accident had “exacerbated preexisting injuries to the plaintiff's right shoulder and the cervical and lumbar regions of her spine. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:48 am by Peter A. Mahler
Some nine years ago I wrote about an LLC dissolution case titled Goldstein v Pikus decided by former Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Charles Ramos which also involved a bitter dispute between two estranged co-managing members of a realty-holding LLC. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiffs, however, failed to sufficiently plead how the concealment of this relationship caused plaintiffs any damages or led to any adverse rulings in the divorce action (see Saporito v Branda, 213 AD3d 588, 589 [1st Dept 2023]; DeMartino v Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara & Wolf, LLP, 189 AD3d 774, 776 [2d Dept 2020]; Jean v Chinitz, 163 AD3d 497, 497 [1st Dept 2018]; cf. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:43 am by Gene Takagi
Additional Resources for Context Brief of Professor Roger Colinvaux as Amicus Curiae in Support of Defendants-Appellees and Affirmance: American Alliance for Equal Rights v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
The SEC alleged that SolarWinds overstated the strength of its cybersecurity practices and prevention measures, and then failed to tell the whole truth after learning of a massive breach regarding Orion that impacted many of its key customers. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
The SEC alleged that SolarWinds overstated the strength of its cybersecurity practices and prevention measures, and then failed to tell the whole truth after learning of a massive breach regarding Orion that impacted many of its key customers. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
 An example of this use of the bad man thought experiment is provided in Justice Souter's opinion in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm by Bill Marler
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[42] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]