Search for: "Fair v. Poole" Results 341 - 360 of 1,026
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2012, 5:30 am by Don Cruse
This case comes from the Dallas Court, which has seen its fair share of this litigation. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 4:33 pm by Barry Herman
  Princo also points to arguments it made about how the cost of patent licenses went down when the Taiwan Fair Trade Commission ordered the pool licensors to license the patents individually. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 3:49 am by SHG
To be fair, it’s not as if seats haven’t been deemed “owned” by a demographic. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:10 pm by The Charge
Massachusetts' fair cross section-type argument predates and is cited within Batson v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:35 am by Lyle Denniston
  The Justices seemed far more interested in the jury issue than in the other high-profile question before them in Skilling v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:00 am by Amy Howe
Chatman, the case of a Georgia death-row inmate who argues that prosecutors’ exclusion of all of the African Americans in the jury pool from his trial ran afoul of the Court’s 1986 decision in Batson v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:59 am by Ben
In return, the publishers are entitled to receive fair compensation. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am by tekEditor
The Court's claim construction applies to data in the constant pool tables as well as the actual field data in an instance object. 18   C. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:59 am by Keith Szeliga
”[30] The allocation method guides the distribution of indirect costs to cost objectives and must distribute indirect costs to final cost objectives in a manner that reflect each cost objective’s fair share of the indirect [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:38 am
The extension of liability beyond the private setting was made explicit in Delfino v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 10:04 am
Peter Martinsson noted the Avanci pool as a step in that direction.Gertjan asked about the consequences of late declaration (noting the Apple v Core Wireless decision in the Federal Circuit). [read post]