Search for: "Fall v. State Bar" Results 341 - 360 of 4,475
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2019, 8:58 am by Patricia Hughes
Prince Edward Island (PEISC (AD)) (aff’d by the Supreme Court of Canada) and the BC Court of Appeal decision in R. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Out-of-state employers, insurers, employee benefit plan vendors, and other businesses registered to do business in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, or another state that requires that out-of-state businesses consent to jurisdiction as a condition of their registration to do business in the state face a heightened risk of getting hauled into court in the consent to jurisdiction state following last month’s Supreme Court decision in… [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 5:10 am by Eugene Volokh
But last Fall, our case got derailed by what is called Younger abstention: The federal court abstained from hearing the case because there were state proceedings pending, in this case a state restraining order against Rynearson barring him from saying certain things about the activist. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 1:20 pm
  Or at least no good reason sufficient to outweigh our desire to help everyone vote and make the thing easy.But if a state disagrees, today's opinion holds that the Constitution (and federal postal laws) are no bar. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 12:50 am by The Public Employment Law Press
 It should also be noted that there is no bar to providing information pursuant to a FOIL request, or otherwise, that falls within one or more of the exceptions that the custodian could rely upon in denying a FOIL request, in whole or in part, for the information or records demanded.John Jaronczyk wanted certain overtime records maintained by the Nassau County Sheriff's Department. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:39 am
Fellow State Bar Convention panelist Brian Reider recently alerted our panel */ to the Fourth Appellate District's August 26, 2009, decision Parada v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm by Andrew Stine
The writ of prohibition mandates the inferior court to cease any action over the case because it may not fall within that inferior court's jurisdiction. [read post]