Search for: "Fields v. Benefits Review Board*"
Results 341 - 360
of 537
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2015, 6:19 am
Indeed the Featured Artists Coalition and the globally-focused International Artists Organisation have issued an urgent call to the European Parliament demanding That the Parliament ensures that performer rights be included in the European Union's current review of copyright law. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm
However, on reviewing Tartan Army’s case, it amounted to no more than saying that Mr Emerson carried out various acts in his capacity as director and shareholder. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 12:32 pm
Critics say the agreement benefits developed countries at the cost of developing countries. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:10 pm
DOL claims that its investigators found Halliburton violated the FLSA by incorrectly categorizing and failing to pay overtime to more than 1000 employees working as field service representatives, pipe recovery specialists, drilling tech advisors, perforating specialists and reliability tech specialists when they worked more than 40 hours in a workweek. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:05 am
V, § 15, Fla. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 10:00 pm
Co. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 1:56 pm
From Munn v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 8:00 pm
The main benefits involve Sanctions relief. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
David V. [read post]
28 May 2015, 4:00 am
Electronic records management is a complex technology, which makes current legal infrastructure of statutes, guidelines, and case law that controls the use of electronic records as evidence very inadequate because it ignores these facts: (1) electronic records technology, and pre-electronic paper records technology are very different technologies—each requires its own unique legal infrastructure; (2) the many serious defects frequently found in electronic records management systems… [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:28 am
Although it is particularly prevalent in the fields of oncology and pediatrics, off-label use is frequent across a broad range of medical specialties. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:10 am
In two recent decisions, Fordham v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:23 am
After reviewing their paper, I approached Mark to see if he would be willing to participate in a Q&A for this website, discussing his views on the topic. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:05 am
The decision, issued on Friday, March 20th by the DOL Administrative Review Board (Board) in the case of Powers v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
At its Conference on March 20, 2015, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as the legality of Wisconsin’s voter ID law, a court’s denial of a criminal defendant’s constitutional right to testify, and a “policy” or “custom” of Brady v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:22 am
” Nor did the Arizona Supreme Court’s decision in Fields v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:11 am
The FTC analyzes that under the Pfizer factors the type of product, the type of claim, the benefit of a truthful claim, the ease of developing substantiation for the claim, the consequences of a false claim, and the amount of substantiation experts in the field would consider reasonable. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
See Witkoff v. [read post]
