Search for: "G. Taylor" Results 341 - 360 of 729
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2010, 3:18 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Davis v R [2010] EWCA Crim 708 (31 March 2010) Greaves & Ors v R [2010] EWCA Crim 709 (31 March 2010) Delucca, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 710 (31 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Valentines Homes & Construction Ltd, R (on the application of) v HM Revenue and Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 345 (31 March 2010) Servier Laboratories Ltd v National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 346 (31 March 2010) Vaughan v Vaughan… [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:27 am by David Lat
Charlotte Taylor (NYU 2008 / Rakoff (S.D.N.Y.) / Katzmann) 3. ? [read post]
20 May 2019, 8:24 am by Berry Law Firm
Van Houten – TayLor – Brittany American Cemetery Richard H. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 7:46 am
Montag, The Taylor Analysis and Taylor Modified Categorical Approach - When does the crime fit the removal ground? [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:23 am by Steve Hall
On Feb. 17, 2010, after spending 6,149 of his adult days behind bars, Taylor was exonerated by a three-judge panel. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by Alexandra Walsh
In a recent article published in Psychiatric Services, Amy G. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:31 pm by Denis Stearns
Calder L, Simmons G, Thornley C, Taylor P, Pritchard K, Greening G, Bishop J. (2003). [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 9:37 am
Calder L, Simmons G, Thornley C, Taylor P, Pritchard K, Greening G, Bishop J. (2003). [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 8:09 pm by Patti Waller
Calder L, Simmons G, Thornley C, Taylor P, Pritchard K, Greening G, Bishop J. (2003). [read post]
20 Aug 2006, 7:37 pm
"So, returning to Caldwell, how do we decide what incursions on our liberties are worth paying, given very low p's but quite high g's? [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:49 pm
Calder L, Simmons G, Thornley C, Taylor P, Pritchard K, Greening G, Bishop J. (2003). [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/O6SDcpZwZI -> FCA upholds decision that CSIS lawyers lied to the court to obtain warrants to spy on Canadians outside of Canada http://t.co/LX8S1MmnjN -> FCC CONFIRMS SOLICITED FAX ADS MUST INCLUDE AN OPT-OUT http://t.co/B1BdhuFzKj -> FCC: The New Data Security Sheriff In Town http://t.co/6rU9ATiZwd -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-11-05: Canadian hospital, sick of US test monopoly, sues to stop g… http://t.co/f2RFnYowdx -> David Kent,… [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm by Frodnesor
Noting a split of authority in the decided cases on whether a filing in violation of 109(g) is void ab initio, Judge Isgur concluded instead that 362(b)(21) was adopted "with the apparent intent to legislatively overrule courts that were misapplying the statute as written. [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm by Frodnesor
Noting a split of authority in the decided cases on whether a filing in violation of 109(g) is void ab initio, Judge Isgur concluded instead that 362(b)(21) was adopted "with the apparent intent to legislatively overrule courts that were misapplying the statute as written. [read post]