Search for: "General Corporation v. General Motors Corporation" Results 341 - 360 of 864
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2015, 2:15 pm by Schachtman
Leinweber Company, Inc., Driv-Lok, Inc., Ford Motor Company, and ExxonMobil Oil Corporation. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
  However, Hill went beyond Dumas and, even assuming that a lost chance claim could exist generally, refused to apply it to product liability cases:[T]he lost chance doctrine, even when recognized, has been limited to medical malpractice cases. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  We took a look, but first we had to eliminate those states that, for one reason or another, generally preclude punitive damages, allowing drug and device manufacturers to enjoy The Day of the Dove in common-law cases. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 8:46 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  It generally will cover jobs typically performed on call 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 6:14 am
Fred Martin Motor Co., 374 F.3d 797 (U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
   See, e.g., In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation, 80 F. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:42 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
” BMW Dallas issued the warranty and “appointed United States Warranty Corporation as the authorized Administrator for th[e] . . . [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:42 pm by MOTP
” BMW Dallas issued the warranty and “appointed United States Warranty Corporation as the authorized Administrator for th[e] . . . [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
  While the Pope was visiting Washington, DC, the Kentucky Supreme Court reversed a multi-million dollar punitive damages award in Nissan Motor Co., Ltd v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
Necessarily the cases considered are but a selection but one that, in my view, is sufficiently broad to enable some general conclusions about the performance of the Court to date. [read post]