Search for: "Golden v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 1,885
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2019, 12:39 pm by Nassiri Law
Women-to-men earnings in the Golden State has ranged from about 83 percent (in 2001) to nearly 91 percent in 2005. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 5:02 pm by Nassiri Law
Employment attorneys in Orange County recognize this decision handed down by the court could have a significant impact on both employers and workers in the Golden State. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm by Richard Hunt
The applicable statute of limitations, borrowed from state law, was four years. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 12:29 pm by Nassiri Law
The Golden State is considered more plaintiff-friendly than most on these issues, but that doesn’t mean any worker will have an easy time of it. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 4:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, even accepting the facts alleged in the complaint as true, the complaint fails to allege the existence of an attorney-client relationship, privity, or a relationship that otherwise closely resembles privity between the plaintiffs and Leavitt (see DeMartino v Golden, 150 AD3d 1200, 1201 [2017]; Fredriksen v Fredriksen, 30 AD3d at 371-372; Goldfarb v Schwartz, 26 AD3d 462, 463 [2006]; Rovello v Klein, 304 AD2d at 638-639). [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
In Golden Opportunities Fund Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:51 pm by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
  Turns out the Knicks front office isn’t good at what they do, and Golden State’s is really, really good. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Likewise, the allegations of defamation failed to state a cause of action. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:54 am by Tinker Ready
Despite the losses from these stratospheric salaries and perks, the recruitment efforts had a golden lining for Wheeling, the government asserts. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, even accepting the facts alleged in the complaint as true, the complaint fails to allege the existence of an attorney-client relationship, privity, or a relationship that otherwise closely resembles privity between the plaintiffs and Leavitt (see DeMartino v Golden, 150 AD3d 1200, 1201; Fredriksen v Fredriksen, 30 AD3d at 371-372; Goldfarb v Schwartz, 26 AD3d 462, 463; Rovello v Klein, 304 AD2d at 638-639). [read post]
7 May 2019, 2:27 pm by Ad Law Defense
  That was one of the questions posed to a Utah jury in Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. [read post]