Search for: "Grant v. Board of Retirement" Results 341 - 360 of 1,025
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2018, 2:13 pm
How high is the bar for the grant of a compulsory license? [read post]
11 May 2018, 3:22 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
After publishing the original $6,900 limit in Revenue Procedure 2017-37, Congress changed the rules on inflation adjustments as part of “An Act to Provide for Reconciliation Pursuant to Titles II and V of the Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2018” (the Act), Pub. [read post]
9 May 2018, 8:34 am
How high is the bar for the grant of a compulsory license? [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 9:51 am by Eugene Volokh
But the Government bans him from doing so, because 28 years ago, Hatfield lied on some forms that he sent to the Railroad Retirement Board: a felony in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
First on the agenda is Abbott v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, holding that state courts retain concurrent jurisdiction for liability actions under the Securities Act of 1933. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 8:26 pm
In the two years the appellate panel took after argument to decide the case, one of its members retired, but the other two soldiered on. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 8:10 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Lawrence granted Emmis’s motion for summary judgment on its breach of contract claim but denied Emmis’s motion for summary judgment on its bad faith claim. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
On 21 March 2018 the Supreme Court granted permission to appeal in the case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 9:47 am by Daniel Nathan
Fifth Circuit’s Decision The Fifth Circuit’s decision striking down the DOL’s Fiduciary Rule in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 9:50 am by Amy Howe
Alerus Financial, a case involving the interpretation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 3:53 am by SHG
I assume they’re still taught Hadley v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:19 am by Guido Paola
The appellant even filed to the Board a document describing the skills required by a technically qualified member of the Board of Appeal to show to the Board that the rapporteur objected did not qualified for the function, that the conduct of the Board was a disgrace and went on with this line of mistrust reasoning.A petition for review was finally filed on the grounds of several procedural violations of the opposition division and Board of Appeal.As one… [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:19 am by Guido Paola
The appellant even filed to the Board a document describing the skills required by a technically qualified member of the Board of Appeal to show to the Board that the rapporteur objected did not qualified for the function, that the conduct of the Board was a disgrace and went on with this line of mistrust reasoning.A petition for review was finally filed on the grounds of several procedural violations of the opposition division and Board of Appeal.As one… [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
CALPERS: SECURITIES ACT STATUTE OF REPOSE NOT SUBJECT TO EQUITABLE TOLLING In California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]