Search for: "Harms v. IRS" Results 341 - 360 of 426
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by Emily Chan
– Nonprofit Law Blog Automatic Revocation Exemption List – IRS  The End of Small Nonprofits That Have Not Filed Form 990 – Nonprofit Law Blog 5. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 11:58 am by admin
On December 8, 2011, the United States Tax Court issued an opinion in Whistleblower v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:08 am by David Oscar Markus
Kraushaar's settlement was about $45,000, Politico reported.According to several published reports, Kraushaar, 55, heads up communications for a bureau within the IRS. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
The IRS correctly determined that it did not have the authority to and did not grant a second six-month extension. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
" Precedent only requires that there could be exposure to asbestos that is substantially probable to lead to serious harm. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:34 am by NL
This, the second post on the riot related possession proposals (the first is here), looks at an article published on the ConservativeHome website by Jake Berry MP, Parliamentary Private Secretary to Grant Shapps, and Tory MP for the gritty urban constituency of Rossendale and Darwen in Lancashire.OK, that last bit may be a bit of a fib, but the roads, lanes and bridle ways of Rossendale and Darwen are, it would seem, not without tensions. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:34 am by NL
This, the second post on the riot related possession proposals (the first is here), looks at an article published on the ConservativeHome website by Jake Berry MP, Parliamentary Private Secretary to Grant Shapps, and Tory MP for the gritty urban constituency of Rossendale and Darwen in Lancashire.OK, that last bit may be a bit of a fib, but the roads, lanes and bridle ways of Rossendale and Darwen are, it would seem, not without tensions. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
The SEC Rule 21F-4(b)(4)(v) allows internal auditors to submit their own whistleblower reward claims in three circumstances: (i) a report to the Commission is necessary to prevent substantial harm to the entity or investors; (ii) the entity is engaging in conduct that will impede our investigation; or (iii) 120 days have elapsed. [read post]