Search for: "Harper v. United States"
Results 341 - 360
of 391
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
But there is no compelling reason to introduce a “public figure” limitation in libel cases, as applies in the United States of America. (3) The defence of “truth” The burden of proving that what has been published is substantially true remains on the defendant. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 3:26 pm
" Harper v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 6:39 am
Following New York Times Co. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 3:30 pm
The textbook case on this issue is Harper & Row v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 8:35 am
Harper and Riggins v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
United States, 139 S. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
(The claimant had relied on the requirements in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167 at [19]). [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Walsh, et al.; SEC v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 1:00 am
” Additionally, when restrictive immigration laws in the 1920s closed the doors to Europe, the Mexican Revolution initiated the first large-scale immigration of Latinos across the border into the United States. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:35 am
– Charles MansonDoesn’t this remind you of the utterly depraved animal crush videos at issue in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Harper & Son, Inc., 160 W. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
[Update] On 27 January 2012 HHJ Parkes QC gave judgment in the case of Patel v United ([2012] EWHC 92 (QB)), heard on 20 January 2012. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:14 am
As a party litigant without representation, Mr Wilson was, according to court observers, forced abroad to Japan and the United States for supportive expert medical reports. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 7:27 am
Harper, suggests that these state legislative powers would be nondelegable, though the Supreme Court has rejected a strong version of this theory. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 5:16 am
A German court enjoined Augustine from falsely claiming that the Bair Hugger led to increased bacterial contamination.[7] The United States FDA considered and rejected Augustine’s claims, and recommended the use of FAWDs. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am
Q10: In the famous copyright fair use case of Harper & Row v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(IPKat) (IPKat) IPO launches ‘Supply Chain Toolkit’ best practice toolkit for avoiding fake goods entering business supply chains (IPKat) Welsh patent applications: the results are in (IPKat) United States US General Government blocks release of documents on secret IP enforcement treaty, ACTA (EFF) Potential names for Obama IP team swirl; WTO IP Chief ‘imminent’ (Intellectual Property Watch) John W Thompson leading candidate for… [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
An application for permission to appeal has been lodged in the case of ZXC v Bloomberg. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 6:12 am
For example, in Dymow v. [read post]
