Search for: "Heller v. New York" Results 341 - 360 of 575
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2014, 8:35 am
New York, but also judicial efforts to protect free speech and enforce other noneconomic freedoms. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:34 am by Terry Hart
And Flo & Eddie filed putative class action suits in California, New York, and Florida. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
But even if decreasing handgun ownership is a permissible justification for government regulations following Heller, it cannot justify this speech restriction. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 6:10 am by Benjamin Bissell
Lawfare contributors devoted a few posts to the upcoming Zivotofsky v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
Massachusetts is one of the several states that bans stun guns (including Tasers) — the others are Hawaii, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin, plus the Annapolis/Baltimore area in Maryland, New Orleans, Washington, D.C., and several other cities. [read post]
25 May 2014, 12:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Family Lawyer said this is a matrimonial action wherein the parties were divorced by judgment entered 24 October 2008. [read post]
25 May 2014, 11:08 am
The defendant relies on the rulings of District of Columbia v Heller and McDonald V City of Chicago. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 6:46 pm by Eugene Volokh
This Court has ruled that New York is entitled to regulate assault weapons and large-capacity magazines under the principal presumption that the law will reduce their prevalence and accessability in New York State, and thus, inversely, increase public safety. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 12:19 pm by Eugene Volokh
Finally, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and North Carolina apparently require up to a month, or in New York’s case up to six months, for a handgun purchase permit (or, in New Jersey, any firearm purchase permit) to be cleared. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 3:14 pm by David Kopel
Finally, the article considers some modern prosecutions, statutes, and cases from Washington, Oregon, Indiana, New York, and D.C. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:21 pm
What's striking is that the clause requires consumers (including the New York resident Ms. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:20 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This does not mean that the courts are recognizing new gun rights.The case is Kwong v. [read post]