Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: J. F., A CHILD" Results 341 - 360 of 713
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2016, 3:30 am by David Markus
Ct. 397, 425 (1953) (Jackson, J., concurring in theresult)). [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:33 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A New York City Family Lawyer said in July, 2004 Plaintiff commenced the within action against ML, F&F, P.C. and John J. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:06 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Joint Checking AccountThe parties shall establish a joint checking account from which either party may withdraw funds for the payment of household and other joint living expenses, including living expenses of the child(ren). [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 5:56 pm by JP Sarmiento
Although J-2 dependents cannot independently apply for a waiver, in cases where a J-2 child reaches 21, the Waiver Review Division may consider requests for waivers on behalf of the J-2 dependent. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
And a parent may ‘curtail a child's exercise of the constitutional rights . . . [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  On September 11, Mailyn Fidler posted an interesting piece on MLAT Reform, and this post addresses some similar issues.[6]]]   Background Law Today, there are a growing number of conflicting substantive and jurisdictional approaches in U.S. and foreign surveillance law. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 3:23 pm by Schachtman
That claim alone should put us on our guard against whose interests are being included and excluded as legitimate “public” interest. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Herbie DiFonzo, Hofstra Law School, “Before the ‘Best Interests of the Child’: Child Custody Presumptions in Nineteenth-Century America”Richard F. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 3:36 am by David Fraser
The cases have generally found that the privacy interests in BSI associated to a phone number are not the same as the privacy interests in BSI linked to an IP address, and distinguish Spencer on that basis. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
Utah’s bigamy statute is overinclusive as to any interest in preventing fraud, domestic abuse, or child sexual abuse. [read post]