Search for: "INTERMEDIATE UNIT I"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,162
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2017, 12:34 pm
(Tom Hood/Associated Press) As I’ve noted, many jurisdictions have repealed their bans on stun guns. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 12:43 pm
Based on partly final and partly intermediate results, only about 9% of those 222 patent assertions (most of them against Android devices) had merit.If you'd like to be updated on the smartphone patent disputes and other intellectual property matters I cover, please subscribe to my RSS feed (in the right-hand column) and/or follow me on Twitter @FOSSpatents and Google+.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 6:39 pm
See United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 6:39 pm
See United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:26 am
” The court says the EO is unconstitutional even using intermediate scrutiny. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 2:46 pm
Since our court’s Second Amendment intermediate scrutiny standard can reach any result one desires, I figure there is no reason why I shouldn’t write an alternative draft opinion that will apply our test in a way more to the liking of the majority of our court. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:08 am
Unless I'm missing something, this would appear to violate basic WTO non-discrimination rules which obligate the United States government to treat domestically-produced and imported goods equally. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 11:49 am
A U.S. service member died from wounds related to an IED explosion in northern Iraq near Mosul, Reuters tells us. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:45 pm
By Mike Dorf Continuing a tradition I started last year, I'm posting my Federal Courts exam. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
John Hyten, testified, “I’m a big supporter [of the treaty] .... [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 4:26 pm
I guess the Obama administration's really gunning for Number 5 in 2012.This feed originates at the personal blog of Scott Lincicome (http://lincicome.blogspot.com). [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:03 am
A ban on “willfully obstruct[ing] the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States, to the injury of the service or the United States” might be applied to speech that opposes the war and expressly or implicitly urges draft resistance (as it was in the World War I-era cases Debs v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 7:48 am
This has significant effects upon the United States. . . . [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 2:57 pm
United States (1983); Roberts v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 7:11 am
I will note, however, that I am generally leery of restructuring the Federal Reserve, both in terms of authority and operation. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 12:37 pm
If HB20 is closely analogous to the must-carry provisions at issue in Turner I, then a winning argument must either explain why HB20 does not trigger intermediate scrutiny like the must-carry provisions did, or else explain why HB20 satisfies intermediate scrutiny. [read post]
25 May 2023, 4:30 am
Not surprisingly, I think this lack of transparency is a bigger problem than he does but that difference does not really matter. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 5:17 am
[with implications for the pending Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 8:58 am
As I say above, I'm not sure how convincing it is, though. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
United States v. [read post]
