Search for: "In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena"
Results 341 - 360
of 601
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
The investigatory grand jury is also used as a tool in the sense that witnesses are subpoenaed to testify before it. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:10 am
Here is the opinion in the sealed case In re Grand Jury Proceedings: 13-2498-01A An excerpt: A venerable legal Latinism, lex non cogit ad impossibilia, teaches that the law does not compel the impossible. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
Proskauer’s attorney time records for November 2008 describe a conversation of November 7 “with Sofia and Michael re: asset protection plan,” followed two days later by a conversation “with Michael Frankel re: asset protection planning. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 11:57 am
In re Grand Jury Subpoena, No. 13-1237, slip op. 4 (3d Cir. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:35 am
Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27 (2000) and lower court cases like In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 383 F.3d 905 (9th Cir.2004); U.S. v.... [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 5:52 am
[Hofstra Law News] * Hunter Moore, the king of online revenge porn, was indicted on 15 federal charges by a grand jury. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:48 am
As the majority admits: To be sure, the case law regarding civil discovery, grand jury subpoenas, and administrative subpoenas shows that relevance is interpreted broadly, and that incidental production of unrelated materials is accepted as essential to enable fulsome investigative efforts. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:20 pm
We’re at a law school, so it’s appropriate to talk about the “theory of the case. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 1:12 pm
FricosuU.S. v Doe (In re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011)Share this: || Join EFF [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
Each development makes it more and more plausible that Judge Wright's referral of Prenda's principals to federal prosecutors will yield a grand jury investigation and, eventually, federal criminal charges. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:00 am
The second is that when collection takes place overseas, “the assumption is you’re not a U.S. person”, i.e. an American or green card holder. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 12:08 pm
Similarly, in re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that decryption and production of a hard drive's content triggered the protection of the Fifth Amendment because it would be testimonial. 670 F.3d 1335 (11th Cir. 2012). [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 5:20 pm
Defendant has issued a subpoena to the District Attorney requesting the following: "Copies of all records, police reports, Criminal Complaints, DD5s, ECAB Sheets, Grand Jury Synopsis Sheets, memo books, follow-up reports, UF-61s, Orders of Protection, Rosario and other discovery material in all cases within the past five (5) years, in which Valerie Seeley was a complaining witness against defendant." [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 12:00 am
Grand jury proceedings are secret. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 4:39 pm
On its face, Section 215 is the authority that is primarily about obtaining physical objects, which would be analogized to the criminal law authority for a grand jury subpoena duces tecum. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 3:49 am
--> After he was charged with “felony charges of conspiracy to transport illegal aliens under 8 U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 8:21 am
The employee, citing In re Grand Jury Proceedings Oct. 12, 1995, argued that the manager revealed both the counsel’s conclusions with respect to his termination, and the facts the employer provided to him, including that he had been involuntarily committed to a psychiatric hospital. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 11:34 am
A case that comes to mind is In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Nov. 15, 1993, 846 F.Supp. 11 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) (Mukasey, J.). [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am
If we indulge the assumption that the investigation is tied to some grand jury inquiry (likely in most, though not all scenarios) then resistance to a valid subpoena is quite hard. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
If the communication is made to the attorney in her capacity as a business adviser, for example, it ought not be privileged”); In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 599 F.2d 504, 511 (2d Cir. 1979) (“Participation of the general counsel does not automatically cloak the investigation with legal garb”). [read post]
