Search for: "In Re: Mark Green v."
Results 341 - 360
of 658
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC vacates FTC’s decision that Rambus breached antitrust duty by violating JEDEC patent disclosure rules and orders new trial: (Philip Brooks), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Hal Wegner), (IPBiz), (IP Law360), UK Court of Appeal rules on whether prior art not in the same design field… [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 12:09 pm
MARKS v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 1:04 am
SOLAR is a Popular Mark; do any of These Uses Violate the FTC Green Guides? [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
Bell Hill Vineyards, LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB affirms mere descriptiveness refusal of STENTALLOY for alloys used to make medical devices: In re Metalwerks PMD, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Boston Red Sox - Red Sox and White Sox oppose e.SOX for cellphone sleeves: Boston Red Sox Baseball Club Limited Partnership and Chicago White Sox, Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
[ILB note: See footnote 5 on p. 12]In Mark White v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 26 August: WIPO symposium on IP and multilateral agreements – Geneva: (IPKat), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South… [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am
After a thirty-five-year career as a letter carrier, the petitioner in Green v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am
Wheel Pros, Inc., et. al.; Mintz v Dietz and Watson (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: False marking case dismissed with prejudice for failure to plead intent: McNamara v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:51 am
Another case: green e for car rental, confusing logos. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 6:05 am
Word Mark 5897362 DOUBLE TIME 5897334 TRANSTAPE 5896926 WE SELL THE EARTH AND EVERYTHING ON IT! [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 11:13 pm
Even if number 1 gets the green light, you usually fall at number 2. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
’s yodel first sound mark granted by India’s trade mark regis [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:31 am
Co., 277 Neb. 203, 762 N.W.2d 24 (2009) Kennecott Greens Creek Mining Co. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v… [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
District http://t.co/pRretycdAF -> Antonick v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am
(Patents Post-Grant) AUTM survey shows significant increases in university patent filings and issuances in FY2010 (Patent Docs) Pending Supreme Court and en banc Federal Circuit patent cases (Patently-O) US Patents – Decisions Shift in grounds of USPTO reexamination rejection examined by CAFC: In re Stepan Company (Patents Post-Grant) (IPBiz) CAFC tackles “consisting of” in In re Taylor (IPBiz) Federal Circuit affirms limits on using litigation expenses to… [read post]
7 May 2010, 9:37 am
Mark Swinnea, Brady Environmental, Inc., and Malmeba Co., No. 07-1042 Justice Green delivered the opinion of the Court: We hold that when a fiduciary fraudulently induced a contract, such a breach of fiduciary duty may give rise to equitable forfeiture of contractual consideration. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
While we almost always have questions relating to the plaintiff's treatment, usually what we're even more interested in is what the prescriber thinks of the drug itself.Was s/he already aware of the claimed risk? [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 1:04 am
Barrister Justin Bates discussed the Rakusen v. [read post]
