Search for: "In Re David W."
Results 341 - 360
of 1,448
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
Low-income individuals also move more frequently on average, so an annual opportunity to re-register could be helpful. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
In In re Marriage of Suggs, the Washington Supreme Court set aside a civil harassment restraining order that barred "knowingly and willfully making invalid and unsubstantiated allegations or complaints to third parties which are designed for the purpose of annoying, harassing, vexing, or otherwise harming [plaintiff] and for no lawful purpose. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
The Interplay between the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause: Is the Supreme Court’s Test for “Public Use” Merely Rational Basis? [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:15 pm
Jordan and Aaron David Miller. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Ben W. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:59 am
Guest Blog Post by Tyler Ochoa [This is part 2 of a 2-part series on the Music Modernization Act. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:01 am
…[W]e’ve grown ever more aware of the problems with centralizing the internet. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:28 am
“[W]hy can’t the state just come in and say we will pay just compensation to anyone who’s been injured by this so long as a state court says it’s a taking? [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:13 am
See In re Viterra, 101 USPQ2d at 1908. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 7:34 am
You’re welcome. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm
Rothman’s complaints about reliance upon “statistical significance,” however, are well-known, and Rothman himself submitted an amicus brief16 in Daubert, a brief that has its own problems.17 In direct response to the Rothman Brief,18 Professor Alvin Feinstein filed an amicus brief in Daubert, wherein he acknowledged that meta-analyses and re-analyses can be valid, but these techniques are subject to many sources of invalidity, and their employment by careful practitioners… [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
The intention of the Board is not to re-regulate the rail industry with burdensome new rules. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 4:44 am
” For the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports that Monday’s order in Fleck v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:33 am
We’re not big believers in this $1.5 billion number and it’s not exactly right that Variety reported that number–the Variety story has changed several times and is still a bit murky. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 6:26 am
Most experts are lukewarm to hand-counted paper ballots, presumably because they’re impractical for large elections with many contests on the ballot. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
Robert W. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:28 am
[USA Today] * "[W]e’re not going to leave any judges behind over these next two months. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 7:18 am
You’re shocked; eh? [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm
James, W. [read post]
