Search for: "In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,611
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2020, 7:00 am
The purposivist inquiry is a total crapshoot. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Now They’re Turning Up. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm
Furthermore, six other judges, one in the Ontario Supreme Court and five on the Ontario Court of Appeal, also held it was valid. [read post]
Latest Twist in the Flynn Case Highlights the Danger of Judicial Deference to Trump’s Administration
24 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
”Deference has been especially prevalent in cases concerning decisions not to prosecute—cases in which courts have resisted issuing writs of mandamus requiring prosecution. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm
The Capital One Decision Unlike some judicial orders concerning post-breach digital forensic reports, Judge Anderson’s decision is lengthy and thorough, and offers a panoramic view into the current legal landscape relating to the confidentiality of post-breach digital forensic reports. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:14 pm
Circuit’s remote hearing concerned whether the appeals court should preemptively order Judge Sullivan to dismiss the case on the theory that he has no authority to do anything else. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am
In In re Silica, the prospect of creating a mass tort out of whole cloth seems to have had just such a distorting influence.[12] As noted by Judge Jack, in making the reliability inquiry, the trial judge has the responsibility “to make certain that an expert … employs in the courtroom the same level of intellectual rigor that characterizes the practice of an expert in the relevant field. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan asked a three-judge panel not to cut short his review of the factual and legal issues surrounding the case. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
Circuit sat en banc to hear argument in a pair of cases concerning when the House (or one of its committees) has Article III standing to seek relief in federal court. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:34 am
Also, they’re a private company, and Trump is not compelled to use Twitter. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
For example, a court might look at an expert witness’s opinion and correctly find that it relied upon epidemiology, and that epidemiology is a generally accepted discipline concerned with identifying causes. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm
Meanwhile, frontline lawyers continue to express concern about the impact of remote hearings for clients. [read post]
22 May 2020, 3:00 am
., raising concerns that a key U.S. attorney’s office handling multiple investigations of interest to President Trump is becoming further politicized. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:05 pm
Chief Judge Ricardo Martinez of the U.S. [read post]
14 May 2020, 12:09 pm
Where grounds for recusal of trial judge would arise only during sentencing (if at all), defendant was not entitled to writ of mandamus ordering recusal from trial In Re: John Moore, 955 F.3d 384 (April 9, 2020). [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:20 am
Strawbridge says that just because the documents are personal doesn’t mean that they’re not targeting the president and that harassment of the president isn’t a concern. [read post]
11 May 2020, 6:00 am
Judges and courts are not exempt. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
In this post, and perhaps future ones, I elaborate upon the concerns that Mickus documents. [read post]
8 May 2020, 2:02 pm
This is a key element around which China is seeking to put its own mark not just on the discourse of public multilateralism, but on the way in which foreign relations might be undertaken and judged. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 12:59 pm
(…) see also In re Cordis Corp., 769 F.2d 733, 735, 737 (Fed. [read post]
