Search for: "In re: Snowden"
Results 341 - 360
of 678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2014, 2:24 pm
So if you’re known by your enemies, maybe NSA is doing something right. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:29 pm
Her writings on surveillance authorities have been an important part of the site’s coverage of the post-Snowden revelations. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:18 am
Miranda Mowbray, GRUMPY CAT IZ INNOCENT Tristan Henderson, From machine learning to precrime: prediction, consent and Tom Cruise Stephanie Pell, You Can’t Always Get What You Want: How Will Law Enforcement Get What it Needs in a Post-Snowden, Cybersecurity-centric Encryption Era? [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 4:02 am
Kolhatkar runs through a list of notable whistleblowers, including New York City police officer Frank Serpico, tobacco company whistleblower Jeffrey Wigand; Sherron Watkins of Enron; and National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 7:45 am
But we’re reassured that internet anonymity is still good for the world. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 3:35 pm
According to the Court, “[t]he notion of architecture expresses the principle that ‘[t]he individual elements of the Constitution are linked to the others, and must be interpreted by reference to the structure of the Constitution as a whole” (Reference re Senate Reform, 2014 SCC 32). [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:32 am
In the aftermath of the Snowden revelations, there has been much written on the need to extend privacy protections to foreigners. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
The magnitude of a tipper passing confidential company information and a government insider such as Edward Snowden who hands over national classified secrets are incomparable, but what’s similar is who’s doing the lying, cheating, stealing and why they’re doing it. [read post]
12 May 2015, 1:40 pm
We're kidding. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 2:15 pm
Like what you're reading? [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 8:14 pm
Now that federal judges have applied Smith differently in the NSA surveillance cases, the Supreme Court will have to re-examine Smith and decide again what the Fourth Amendment means in this context. [read post]
6 May 2014, 9:28 am
The public response to Snowden's revelations about computer security has, sensibly, centered on a push for more transparency. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 9:15 am
The government relies on Section 702 to carry out mass surveillance on U.S. soil, including both the “PRISM” and “Upstream” programs revealed by Edward Snowden. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 10:44 am
Put crudely, we have a right to know if we’re being conned. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:45 am
We know from the Snowden documents that the NSA is conducting research on both quantum computation and quantum cryptography. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 6:56 am
On the other hand, Edward Snowden who claimed a higher purpose has, in my view, no such claim. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 10:39 am
The motion was filed in November 2013, five months after leaks by Edward Snowden publicly revealed the existence of an NSA bulk collection program. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 3:52 pm
Right now, the United States Congress is facing a fundamental decision about how it will handle mass surveillance confirmed by the Snowden disclosures. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 1:52 pm
In fact, up until the Snowden revelations started a couple months ago, the government was fighting tooth and nail to not only avoid releasing the content of the government's secret interpretation of the Patriot Act, but even the number of pages that were involved. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:23 pm
” And world-famous NSA whistle-blower Edward Snowden tweeted in 2016 what in information security circles would become a meme and truism: “Use Tor. [read post]
