Search for: "In re Cal. E." Results 341 - 360 of 1,058
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2021, 5:27 am by Eugene Volokh
[E]ven if the State's interest in people receiving vaccines were a compelling interest, the Statute is not narrowly drawn to achieve that interest. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
A lot of what follows is taken in more or less edited form from the amicus brief that Bexis filed with the California Supreme Court in Conte - a copy of which we're making available, here.One major problem with Conte is that the court placed form over substance. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 3:09 pm by sevach
Por otra parte, el Decreto incluía una auténtica perla del museo de los horrores del empleo público: “ En los procedimientos para la provisión de cargos intermedios podrá participar toda persona que, con sujeción a las prescripciones del presente Decreto, reúna los requisitos exigidos en las bases de la convocatoria, sin necesidad de estar previamente vinculada como personal funcionario o estatutario al Sistema Nacional de Salud”.… [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 7:49 am
If you're reading this at work, you may be committing a federal crime (depending on where you are reading it, and you're employer's policies about reading the internet). [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:23 pm
” â€" In re Marilyn H. (1993) 5 Cal.4th 295, 310, 851 P.2d 826; 19 Cal. [read post]