Search for: "In re Chen "
Results 341 - 360
of 737
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2015, 9:29 am
Oct. 10, 2014); Chen v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
In 2000, in Chen v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 8:33 am
See In Re TracFone Unlimited Service Plan Litig., No. 13-3440 [...] [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:03 pm
" Well, if you're the outlier, here's some help. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 3:40 pm
District Judge Pamela Chen that the damage to his reputation was punishment enough, Judge Chen disagreed, sentencing Grimm to eight months in prison. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 12:47 pm
by Dennis Crouch In re Cuozzo Speed Tech (Fed. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:43 am
Juan Chen, Cancellation No. 92059168 (April 28, 2015) [not precedential], the Board entered judgment summarily on Chen's defense of res judicata or claim preclusion. [read post]
15 May 2015, 7:03 am
In re Agent Orange Product Liab. [read post]
13 May 2015, 12:12 pm
I communicated after the event with Ivy Chen Shenglan. [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:01 am
Catherine Chen, an anesthesiologist, told KHN, “ it’s almost like saying you’re going to get your nails done. [read post]
6 May 2015, 8:54 am
Shun-Ling Chen, Academia Sinica Law Institution, is publishing Exposing Professionalism in United States Copyright Law: The Disenfranchised Lay Public in a Semiotic Democracy in volume 49 of the University of San Francisco Law Review (2015). [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:12 pm
Oct. 10, 2014); Chen v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:55 pm
Chen is ordinarily an acute and thoughtful observer of the legal scene, and interesting issues are presented here (at least if you’re an ethics geek like me), that’s not the issue at all: No one contends an attorney-client relationship was actually formed, and no attorney-client relationship need have been formed for Boies Schiller to be disqualified. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:12 am
Oct. 10, 2014); Chen v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 1:24 pm
Oct. 10, 2014); Chen v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 5:39 pm
Image courtesy of Flickr by Aray Chen [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
Under the estoppel doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, each requires a showing that there was an identity of the parties in the present and prior litigation (Juan C. v Cortines, 89 NY2d 659 [1997]), that the claims arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions (Xiao Yang Chen v Fischer, 6 NY3d 94 [2005]), that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to contest the claims (Krista I. v Gregory I., 8 AD3d 696 Page 5 [3d Dept 2004]) and the prior… [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
Under the estoppel doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, each requires a showing that there was an identity of the parties in the present and prior litigation (Juan C. v Cortines, 89 NY2d 659 [1997]), that the claims arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions (Xiao Yang Chen v Fischer, 6 NY3d 94 [2005]), that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to contest the claims (Krista I. v Gregory I., 8 AD3d 696 Page 5 [3d Dept 2004]) and the prior… [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 9:31 pm
See also In re Bath & Kitchen Fixtures Antitrust Litig., 535 F.3d 161, 165 (3d Cir. 2008) (“[A] filing under [FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(i)] is a notice, not a motion. [read post]
