Search for: "In re GARLAND"
Results 341 - 360
of 768
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2017, 12:00 am
”), and David Garland on The Welfare State: A Very Short Introduction. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:00 am
But they’re also ideals shared, at that level of abstraction, by most non-libertarians in American politics today. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 7:11 am
At the end of January 1973, a month into Richard Nixon's second term in office, two officials of his re-election committee (CREEP) were found guilty of conspiracy, burglary and bugging the Democratic Party’s headquarters at the Watergate office complex. [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:24 am
Just look at the blockbuster Broadway hits of the last few decades: Wicked, an adaption of Gregory Maguire’s novel, a re-telling of L. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 5:00 pm
Unless, of course, you're guilty. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 12:49 pm
They're only saying that "If Attorney General Merrick Garland and his staff conclude that there is sufficient evidence to establish Mr. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 6:29 am
But it may not last, as the question will then turn to whether the Biden administration validly re-classified the same information. [read post]
12 May 2023, 6:00 am
One can still believe that Garland would have made a fine justice of the Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 6:48 am
You’re furious about the Senate Republican’s treatment of Garland. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 6:40 am
They’re not here to hurt me. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 5:48 am
Garland's re-nomination was never a serious option. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 4:28 am
” Having recognized that his own nominations can be torpedoed (as well as anything else he proposes), acting presidential entails telling Republican senators that held up Garland that Americans are sick and tired of stupid political games, that he has come to Washington to actually get stuff done, and therefore re-nominates him. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 8:02 am
” Clinton did not say, and Wallace did not ask, whether she would re-nominate Garland if she were elected and the Senate had not acted on his nomination by the time she took office. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:14 am
., Judges Merrick Garland, Sidney Thomas, and Diane Wood — for the SCOTUS slot. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
Just as the Democrats will one day hold up a Supreme Court seat under the “McConnell Rule” in response to the Garland nomination. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 12:13 pm
We’re ready to move on to the confirmation hearing cycle! [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:28 am
Small-government advocates and civil libertarians should appreciate her while we have her, because you'll miss her once she's gone. * Keller and Yeary each also had eight concurring/dissenting opinions; no other judge had more than one.** Yeary, Newell and Richardson were only on the court for eight months of FY 2015, which ended 8/31/15.*** As long as they don't re-nominate Merrick Garland. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 7:55 am
But DOJ moved to dismiss without prejudice, reserving the right to seek re-indictment. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 4:26 am
Even if they’re wrong, are they understandable or forgivable? [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:32 am
Putting the pieces together, yesterday’s election results are good news if you’re Merrick Garland but bad news if you’re Goodwin Liu. 2. [read post]
