Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 2" Results 341 - 360 of 1,928
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2012, 10:30 pm by Linda A. Kerns, Esquire
Mother initially complied, but, in the summer of 2010, she failed to abide by the rules that Luzerne County Children and Youth Services (“CYS”) had established. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 6:35 am
’In re D.J., supra.The opinion goes on to explain that,[a]t approximately 2:00 p.m., Sacramento Police Officer Carlos Martinez went to the school in response to `a threats call. [read post]
20 May 2012, 4:15 pm
Read the whole case, In re Haley D., 2011 IL 110886, by clicking here. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 9:44 am by Michael A. Conforti
Recently, after a trip up to the United States Supreme Court and back down to the Oregon District Court, the Ninth Circuit ultimately agreed by a 2-1 majority to allow the defendants’ mandamus petition to proceed. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:39 am
Those travelers who already have a valid ESTA do not have to re-register or pay the fee at this time. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 12:25 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Family Lawyer said that on 12 October 2001, a petition was filed against the respondent mother. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 6:33 pm by S2KM Limited
Currently subject to a petition for review by the Illinois Supreme Court, this case (which also involves a J.G. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
Before re-applying, make sure there are no other grounds for denying the initial application. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 10:30 am by Cicely Wilson
In contrast, the nieces, nephews, and grandchildren of the initial sponsors cannot qualify for “automatic conversion. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 5:02 pm by Larry Golub
Debra Bowen, filed by Michael D’Arelli, the Executive Director of the American Agents Alliance and a proponent of the initiative, is in the form of a writ petition against California Secretary of State Debra Bowen, who the suit states is responsible for the preparation of the ballot pamphlet. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 3:08 pm by sklemp
This is a mandatory pretrial procedure that occurs within 35 days after the response to the parental responsibilities petition has been filed but no later than 182 days after the initial petition was filed. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Apple Inc., 809 F.3d 1307, 1313–14 (Fed.Cir. 2015) (refusing to review Board’s consideration ofobviousness in the final decision despite not being raisedin the initial petition); Achates, 803 F.3d at 658 (refusingto review the Board’s assessment of the time-bar provisionsof § 315(b)); In re Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC, 793F.3d 1268, 1273–74 (Fed. [read post]