Search for: "In re SIMPSON."
Results 341 - 360
of 1,324
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
A brief review of the justifications usually given for the exclusions for marks that are scandalous or disparaging: (1) the harm done by the government endorsement represented by a registration; (2) the desire to withhold government resources from disparaging or scandalous terms; (3) the lack of any effect on a user’s ability or right to use the mark, with (a) possible §43(a) or state common law protection against confusing uses despite unregistrability, though this is not at all… [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 7:59 am
Fish don't know they're swimming. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
They’re all expressive. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:55 pm
Archie Bunker, Homer Simpson and Peter Griffin were the norm. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
In theory, that encourages people to know the prior art and not waste time re-inventing the wheel.And recall the South Park episode relating to "the Simpsons already did it. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 5:42 am
Was it sort of a performance in which the white man was the Bart Simpson, taking his punishment? [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:29 pm
” Despite the anti-student campaign boasting 300 local residents and a situation which Ms Chard described in the following way: “I keep imagining The Simpsons, when they’re going around with the pitchforks” The council’s press office, as ever, try to put a positive spin on it “Complaints about anti-social behaviour are resurfacing as term starts, but councillors are keen to highlight the positive reaction of most towards students. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:54 pm
Simpson's latest appeal. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 3:49 pm
Simpsons-Sears Ltd., 1985 CanLII 18 (SCC), [1985] 2 S.C.R. 536, 52 O.R. (2d) 799 (note), 17 Admin. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 6:01 am
(Bombardier Aerospace Training Center), 2015 SCC 39 (35625) July 23, 2015 The context here and the fact racial profiling is prohibited form of discrimination does not change the two-step process re a complaint under the Québec Charter. [read post]
15 Aug 2015, 9:42 pm
Police Dept., 1086 Simpson St. 1201 Lafayette Ave. 230 East 123rd St. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
[National Law Journal via TaxProf Blog] * Simpson Thacher isn't the only Biglaw firm that allegedly blew it when it came to turning hundreds of General Motors' secured creditors into unsecured creditors. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 1:52 pm
” “We’re not asking the government to decide what links should be removed,” said Simpson. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
Wall Street Journal, They’re Back! [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
I want to reiterate my call to think of consumers and not the consumer—the plurality/bell curve concept is logically independent of the idea of treating consumers differently in different contexts, but I think that conceiving of consumers in the plural more easily allows us to adjust to different contexts, such as the nuclear reactor not run by Homer Simpson. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
That Homer Simpson might be confused is irrelevant. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
Like Jessica Simpson in her skinny phase? [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 3:35 am
In a few months, we’re holding a webcast – “Regulation A/A+: Developing Market Practices” – to show you how market practice has developed… “Tenure Voting”: Cure for Activism? [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:48 am
Simpson, “D’oh! [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 7:37 am
June 18, 2015 Guest Post By John Simpson (Shift Law) The Federal Court’s recent decision in Red Label Vacations Inc. [read post]
