Search for: "In re Taylor C."
Results 341 - 360
of 525
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2012, 2:49 am
In 1990, the Supreme Court approved legislative restrictions on corporate election spending, because “[c]orporate wealth can unfairly influence elections. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
Bill BuxtonMicrosoft ResearchOriginal: Jan. 12, 2007Version: March 2, 2012 Keywords / Search Terms Multi-touch, multitouch, input, interaction, touch screen, touch tablet, multi-finger input, multi-hand input, bi-manual input, two-handed input, multi-person input, interactive surfaces, soft machine, hand gesture, gesture recognition . [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 11:23 am
fragmentation in IEL Chair: Marion Panizzon (University of Bern) Thomas Cottier (University of Bern) and Hannes Schloemann (WTI Advisors), Re? [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
In the case of Re Taylor (1925), 27 O.W.N. 497, [1925] O.J. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm
Resources Robert C Post, “Social Foundations of Defamation Law: Reputation and the Constitution”, California Law Review, Vol 74, Issue 3. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 6:00 am
William C. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
The following case is published below with my own commentary added in the blue fields. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 3:52 pm
Research and Development communications and re-branding strategies for the company’s Warner-Lambert merger and Pharmacia acquisition. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 8:39 am
The author of this blog is Douglas C. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 5:33 pm
Barclay agreed his newspapers were conservative “with a small c and a big C” as suggested by Barr during questioning. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
Courts are willing to stop improper means, but they’re uncomfortable calling it a true secret if it would be simple to figure out. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm
The Court’s concern in Wal-Mart that “[c]onsumers should not be deprived of the benefits of competition with regard to the utilitarian and esthetic purposes that product design ordinarily serves by a rule of law that facilitates plausible threats of suit against new entrants,” is as applicable to aesthetic functionality in the fashion market as it is to the rule that product design cannot be inherently distinctive. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
(c) Nothing in this section shall affect the provisions of Section 1216. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
STUART TAYLOR: It does. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:07 pm
In re Payam MAHMOODZADEH.No. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:31 am
Schwarzenegger, 556 F.3d 950 (9th Cir. 2009) Vinyl Chloride Taylor v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 11:04 am
Ohio); Laura Taylor Swain (53, S.D.N.Y.); and Linda T. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:53 pm
They're paying their monthly minimums, but that's about all. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 8:31 pm
But there is no constitutional right to R-E-S-P-E-C-T, as Aretha might put it. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:37 am
Before the pigeons get wise C. [read post]
