Search for: "In re the Interest of J. R."
Results 341 - 360
of 2,803
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2021, 10:27 am
From In re Piland, decided by the Michigan Court of Appeals Thursday, in an opinion by Judge Michael J. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
(As an interesting side note, almost three-quarters of Mississippi’s budget is paid by the federal government. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 11:04 am
With renewed interest in greater R&D spending at the federal level and increasing international competition for innovative activity, it is important to get the tax treatment of R&D right to avoid undermining America’s innovative edge. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 10:01 pm
S., at ___ (statement of GORSUCH, J.) [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm
IN THE NEWS President Joseph R. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 8:59 am
Sincerely, CHRISTOPHER J. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 2:34 pm
Miller & Victor J. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 12:14 pm
CSIS experts Jacob Kurtzer and J. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 9:58 am
On April 1, 2021, United States President Joseph R. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 9:58 am
On April 1, 2021, United States President Joseph R. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm
” WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a forthcoming article in the Harvard Environmental Law Review, Margot J. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
The case law also makes clear that a party must move promptly to object to an expert witness’s conflict of interest.[7] Not the same product, but similar product, in a later case When the expert witness in question testified for an adversary in a different case, the analysis of confidential aspect of the shared information becomes more difficult. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 5:21 am
But like the most interesting villains, it’s untamed. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm
., 139 S.Ct. 986 (2019), was a perfect canvas on which to sketch out tort law’s failure to come to grips with the three-way relationship among industrial product seller, sophisticated industrial or military purchasers and employers, and injured plaintiffs.[1] Many commentators might have viewed the justices who squared off in DeVries, Kavanaugh for the majority, Gorsuch for the dissent, as cut from the same judicial cloth, but their two opinions diverged in interesting ways. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm
Seventh Circuit (1987) (Easterbrook, J.): Affirmed. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Public speakers (IRPR, s 186(j)). [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 3:09 am
Accordingly, although the fact pattern which led to Marcus Smith J’s decision seems quite unusual – rare indeed will be the Form of Order hearing that falls on the eve of the oral hearing before the TBA – his “interesting question” seems to suggest that a similar outcome may be possible in the context of a much more conventional set of facts. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am
Jonas Anderson & Paul R. [read post]
