Search for: "Interest of L.J."
Results 341 - 360
of 856
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2018, 7:24 am
Examining data from 1,153 cases, Ruben and Blocher presented a wealth of interesting findings. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 9:34 am
Thomas III, Lost in the Fog of Miranda, 64 HASTINGS L.J. 1501 (2013), available here. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 2:22 pm
Langbein, in Will Contests, 103 Yale L.J. 2039 (1994). [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 7:26 am
L.J. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 9:46 am
L.J. 1397, 1400 (1999); Stephen Breyer, Keynote Address, 97 Am. [read post]
3 May 2007, 7:25 pm
Tom highlighted a number of interesting phenomena in his post, one of which I will discuss in some detail here. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:33 am
L.J. 1, 19-20 (2004) (footnotes omitted). [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 8:57 am
"What interests us there is her Footnote 11, where she writes:"11. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 9:03 am
L.J. 1113, 1134-48 (2003). [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 11:36 am
L.J. 21, 1-25 (2008). [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:29 pm
NFL: An Opportunity to Reshape Sports Law" (forthcoming in Yale L.J.) [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:21 pm
L.J. 1 (2007), documented the de facto delegation of the majority of Article III judicial power to inadequately supervised non-judicial actors, and the origins of nonprecedential status rules in the federal bench's mistrust of the accuracy of the judging done in its name. [read post]
25 Dec 2010, 4:17 am
Rev. 651, 681-88 (2008) (stating Samson ignores important Fourth Amendment interests of parolees and overstates state interests); David M. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 4:51 pm
Professor Tushnet has published many interesting articles, including “Rules of Engagement” (Yale L.J. 1998), which addressed the law governing engagement rings. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
L.J. 773 (1995). [read post]
17 Sep 2022, 3:18 pm
L.J. 241, 250 n.29 (1999). [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:19 am
Shreve, Federal Injunctions and the Public Interest, 51 GEO. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:46 pm
Instead, performers’ rights are the correct mechanism to protect the relevant interest (see Let’s dance! [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:43 pm
L.J., 97, 1567, 1568–69 nn. 1–5 and accompanying text (2009) (which contains the history of Model Rule 8 .2). [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 10:14 pm
L.J. 435 (2004). [read post]
