Search for: "JAMES R. TAYLOR" Results 341 - 360 of 527
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2012, 9:13 am
Since this is a fantastic idea, I would like to suggest further artists to treat in this manner, as follows: David Bowie; Harry Chapin; Nirvana; Warren Zevon; James Taylor; Weezer; Son Volt (naturally); Billy Joel; Coldplay; the Jayhawks; Barenaked Ladies; Brad Paisley; Biz Markie; Allman Brothers Band; Robbie Fulks . . . [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 2:36 am by SO Issues
Tim PhelanOriginal Article 04/18/2012 By Taylor Provost LYNN - The American Civil Liberties Union has filed a lawsuit against the city of Lynn on behalf of area sex offenders challenging the legality of the city’s sex offender ordinance, City Attorney James Lamanna said Tuesday. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 1:52 pm
In our continuing quest to keep you up-to-date, not only on new technology applications, but also in the on-the-regular provision of updates respecting technology applications that we have already covered, I present to you “Product Update: Chrometa”. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 5:16 am by Rob Robinson
Follow @InfoGovernance eDiscovery News Content and Considerations 4th Circuit Rules Computer Oversight Not 'Excusable Neglect' - http://t.co/ISZjFNI (Francis Lawall, James Carnigan) Avoiding an Electronic Discovery Disaster with Litigation Holds - http://tinyurl.com/3wjrcp8 (Reed Smith) Company Monitors Facebook Writings for Pre-Employment Screening Program - http://tinyurl.com/3gz8ft5 (Jason Boog) Copyright, Defamation Suit Reinstated Against N.J. 'Shock Jocks' -… [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 3:33 am by Schachtman
In the aftermath of the killings of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor and Ahmaud Arbery, the Aristotlean Society engaged in this bit of moral grandstanding, of which The Philosopher would have likely disapproved: A statement from the Aristotelian Society “The recent killings of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor and Ahmaud Arbery have underlined the systemic racism and racial injustice that continue to pervade not just US but also British society. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 5:03 am by Ben
 Taylor Swift may is facing a new copyright challenge over her 2014 hit “Shake It Off". [read post]
29 May 2022, 9:20 am by Keith Mallinson
This is an excellent biennial event, organized this year by Professor Sir Robin Jacob of UCL Laws and James Marshall of Taylor Wessing. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
 National Velvet - (1944) (Horse) (Elizibeth Taylor)   8. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/YkUQ3jeQmE -> 16 Artists That Are Now Speaking Out Against Streaming http://t.co/qvQ8uiG6rN -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-12-05: Copyright in papercuts Taylor v Maguire [2013] EWHC 3804 (IP… http://t.co/QOJ1AUgxEO -> Tired of unsolicited spam? [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 4:29 am by Jonathan Rosenfeld
Camillus Rehabilitation & Nursing Center 494 Elm Street Stamford, CT 06902 The William and Sally Tandet Center for Continuing Care 146 W Broad Street Stamford, CT 06902 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA – DC Rock Creek Manor 2131 O Street NW Washington, DC 20037 DELAWARE – DE Atlantic Shores Rehabilitation & Health Center 231 South Washington Street Millsboro, DE 19966 FLORIDA – FL Capital Healthcare Center 3333 Capital Medical Blvd Tallahassee, FL 32308 Bon Secour Maria anor 10300… [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 6:33 pm by Kenneth Anderson
”   Taylor concludes:The book certainly does not let the private sector off the hook, but it is very hard to imagine that heavily regulated banks could have engaged in such extreme risk-taking without the support of regulators. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sandy Levinson is surely correct that James Madison left much to be desired as a constitutional theorist, throwing out ideas that he did not fully explain or develop. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
See, for example, Arland v Taylor, [1955] OR 131 (CA); R v Cinous, [2002] 2 SCR 3; and R v Lavallee, [1990] 1 SCR 852. 13. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 9:14 am by David Post
It instructs fact-finders, as the Court put it in Taylor v. [read post]