Search for: "Jacobs v. Jacobs" Results 341 - 360 of 2,912
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am by Peter Groves
The Court of Appeal upheld that decision in May 2008 ([2008] EWCA Civ 445), the leading judgment being given by Jacob LJ, and in 2009 the EPO Technical Board of Appeal revoked the patent. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:56 am
The High Court ruled, in Clinton David Jacobs v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2010] EWHC 231 (QB), that under European Union Regulation 864/2007 (Rome II), Spanish law applied in the case of a UK resident seeking compensation for serious injuries sustained in Spain, at the hands of an uninsured driver, then resident in Spain.The claimant issued proceedings against the defendant, the Motor Insurers' Bureau, in its capacity as a compensatory body under the Motor Vehicles… [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:56 am
The High Court ruled, in Clinton David Jacobs v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2010] EWHC 231 (QB), that under European Union Regulation 864/2007 (Rome II), Spanish law applied in the case of a UK resident seeking compensation for serious injuries sustained in Spain, at the hands of an uninsured driver, then resident in Spain.The claimant issued proceedings against the defendant, the Motor Insurers' Bureau, in its capacity as a compensatory body under the Motor Vehicles… [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:19 am by INFORRM
This contribution argues that Sanchez v France takes an untenable position regarding third-party liability for content on social media. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:03 am by Peter Smythe
Read the case here: THI of Texas v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 6:27 am by Amy Howe
Brandt Revocable Trust v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 3:52 am by Amy Howe
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 5:45 am
Rather belatedly passing on an interesting case I picked up on my Lawtel update a few days ago about getting an injunction in comparative advertising cases (Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd v Vetplus Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 584 CA (Civ Div) (Pill LJ, Longmore LJ, Jacob LJ) 20/6/2007). [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
[Jeffrey Singer, Cato; Jacob Sullum, Reason] Will the Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling in Merck v. [read post]
29 May 2017, 6:00 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Jacobs, Fifth Amendment in the Digital World, 43 THE REPORTER 2 (2017). [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 3:43 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in Department of Transportation v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
When you spoliate data, you can lose even after you’ve won…  :o) In Hausman v. [read post]