Search for: "John V. York" Results 341 - 360 of 6,527
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2014, 11:13 am
It also contains briefs written by institutions, corporations, and advocacy groups, including NAACP, the ACLU and The New York Times, It covers cases whose landmark decisions have become an essential part of American law, politics and history including Dred Scott v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 1:58 am by Kevin LaCroix
 New York’s high court recently issued a decision that recognized and confirmed this basic limitation in Federal Insurance Co. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 6:55 am by Jennifer Davis
The Supreme Court also cited Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion in Worcester v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 11:13 am by DONALD SCARINCI
It held that private individuals need not show malice as required under the Court’s decision in New York Times v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 3:57 am by Scott Bomboy
Years later, Founding Father Gouverneur Morris said the verdict in Crown v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:31 pm
Blue, New York State Supreme Court Criminal Branch Law Library, First Judicial District, New York, New York [read post]
28 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
That is how Chief Justice John Marshall derived the rule that states cannot tax federal entities in the 1819 case of McCulloch v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:12 pm by centerforartlaw
Court’s Decision Based on the legal arguments presented, on November 24, 2023, Judge John G. [read post]
Unsatisfactory rating voided because employee's "performance review," failed to comply with the employer's own procedures and thus undermined the integrity of the process Joyce v City of New York, 2018 NY Slip Op 03433, Appellate Division, First Department The Appellate Division annulled the determination of respondent New York City Department of Education [DOE] sustaining the "unsatisfactory" rating for the 2010-2011 academic year give to John Joyce, a tenured teacher. The court said that the record demonstrates "deficiencies in the performance review process" that resulted in Mr. Joyce being given an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year. Citing Matter of Gumbs v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484, and Matter of Richards v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 117 AD3d 605, the Appellate Division noted that these deficiencies "were not merely technical, but undermined the integrity and fairness of the process." Mr. Joyce had received a satisfactory rating for the previous academic year and, in contravention of its own procedures, DOE failed to place him on notice that he was in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year until after April 28, 2011. Although DOE's procedures required that tenured teachers in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating have "formal observations including a pre-observation and post-observation conference by the principal ... as part of a prescriptive plan to improve their teaching," Mr. Joyce received only one formal observation which took place one week before the end of the academic year and was not part of a prescriptive plan to improve his performance as a teacher. The decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_03433.htm
30 May 2018, 4:37 am by Public Employment Law Press
Unsatisfactory rating voided because employee's "performance review," failed to comply with the employer's own procedures and thus undermined the integrity of the process Joyce v City of New York, 2018 NY Slip Op 03433, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe Appellate Division annulled the determination of respondent New York City Department of Education [DOE] sustaining the "unsatisfactory" rating for the 2010-2011 academic year give to… [read post]