Search for: "KIRK v. KIRK"
Results 341 - 360
of 730
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2014, 11:18 am
Hobby Lobby Stores and Conestoga Wood Specialties v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:31 am
The Microsoft v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:11 am
” In one of the episodes of the original series, Captain Kirk, the captain of the U.S.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 1:56 pm
Johnson and Johnson, No. 07-3690 Richard Kirkes v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:15 pm
DeMayo v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 7:27 am
If you don't know about Cunningham v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 11:05 am
“I think it’s a great decision and is turning the law back in the direction in which it should have been in the first place,” says Kirk Baert, a partner at Koskie Minsky LLP. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:37 am
Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) and Rep. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 12:15 pm
" S.E.C. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 6:55 pm
Earlier this year the Supreme Court examined the responsibility to appoint counsel in the Texas case Rothgery v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 10:00 am
Kirk Watson, and Weddington. [read post]
26 May 2011, 12:35 pm
Recently, in Schindler Elevator Corp. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 5:54 pm
The SJC’s decision in Hundley v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 10:59 am
Kirk on the public disclosure bar in qui tam suits. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:37 am
Unfortunately, I overlooked the relevant filings by the counsel for Yes on 8, Cooper & Kirk and ADF. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 11:55 pm
Kirk, 777 F.2d 567, 580 n. 18 (10th Cir.1985).Other circuits do not fit neatly into these two camps. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 1:15 am
This Kat has constitutionality concernsMissing The IPKat's posts as they come in doesn't mean missing out: catch up on last week's news and views in this edition of Never Too Late.CopyrightIn a guest post, KatFriend Hanne Kirk (Gorrissen Federspiel) considered the application of the CJEU's Cofemel decision by Denmark's Supreme Court and whether a certain style of black rubber boots with red laces would merit copyright protection.Chijioke Okorie, the… [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:02 am
Circuit Judge Paul V. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 6:41 pm
Although defendant's contention that the indictment was duplicitous on its face is not preserved for our review (see People v Becoats, 17 NY3d 643, 650-651), we nevertheless exercise our power to review it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see People v Bracewell, 34 AD3d 1197, 1198). .. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 8:55 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
