Search for: "Lanham v. Lanham" Results 341 - 360 of 4,397
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2014, 12:39 am by Jarod Bona
You might recall that the Court addressed Lanham Act standing earlier this term in Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:58 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Intellectual Property Trademark infringement; standing Before a plaintiff may assert a claim under the Lanham Act, she must have a commercial interest to protect. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
" Nevertheless, the Supreme Court has declined to review a lower court decision (pdf download) in Pro Football, Inc. v. [read post]
” The the ‘disparagement’ and ‘immoral/scandalous’ clauses of Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act have already been found to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Brunetti and Matal v. [read post]
Thus, the judgment was reversed to the extent that it decided to award profits and the case remanded fort a new trial on that issue (Harbor Breeze Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 4:09 am by Cheryl Beise
The defendant was not a prevailing party entitled to attorney fees under the Lanham Act because there was no court action that materially altered the legal relationship between the parties. [read post]