Search for: "Lemley v. Lemley"
Results 341 - 360
of 568
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2008, 11:35 pm
I've previously blogged on some of the academic literature about the "trademark use in commerce" requirement, including articles by Dinwoodie/Janis and Lemley/Dogan, McKenna, Barrett and Widmaier. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:12 am
In the Microsoft Corp. v. i4i, the Supreme Court must determine whether the burden of proof for parties alleging patent invalidity should be changed from a clear and convincing standard to a preponderance of the evidence standard. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:14 am
In EVE-USA v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 8:17 am
by Dennis Crouch Minerva Surgical Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:23 am
Williamson v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 12:31 pm
Bank v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 9:08 am
One example: Maker’s Mark case v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 10:24 am
CSIRO v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 4:45 am
Flax Managing Director, Litigation ConsultingA2L Consulting In last week’s article on the conclusion of the Apple v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 2:43 pm
It was largely the same echo chamber teeming with Google's best friends as in the Federal Circuit proceedings.By contrast, Samsung's petition refers to the following supporters of its Federal Circuit rehearing petition:Dell Inc., eBay Inc., Facebook Inc., Google Inc., Hewlett-Packard Co., Limelight Networks, Inc., Newegg Inc., SAS Institute Inc., the Hispanic Leadership Fund, the National Black Chamber of Commerce, the National Grange of the Order of the Patrons of Husbandry, the Computer… [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 8:30 am
Part V examines the intervention of a number of 3D printing companies in a Supreme Court of the United States dispute in Star Athletic v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 8:30 am
Part V examines the intervention of a number of 3D printing companies in a Supreme Court of the United States dispute in Star Athletic v. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 1:49 pm
Mark Lemley cites to Vermont in SHOULD PATENT INFRINGEMENT REQUIRE PROOF OF COPYING? [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 9:44 am
Jeremy SheffIP law embodies a conception of distributive justice; this is legitimate but contestable—competing conceptions of justice, not a failure of justice or justice v. efficiency. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
It wasn’t until AT&T v. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 11:30 am
Clontech and Durel v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 11:48 am
Read it here: Colleen V. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:44 pm
Cahn v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:36 am
When the Court granted review in Global Tech Appliances, Inc. v. [read post]
