Search for: "Little v. King" Results 341 - 360 of 1,356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2017, 2:15 am by NCC Staff
On November 13, 1956, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Browder v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 1:12 pm by Jason Mazzone
King (exigent circumstances and the Fourth Amendment); Bullcoming v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 1:35 am by Jani Ihalainen
Information can be very time-sensitive, and that very sensitivity can make it all the more valuable in areas of commerce or activity where quickness is king. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 8:01 am by Andy
We know from caselaw, for example Lucasfilm, Interlegoand the much earlier 'Popeye' case (King Features Syndicate Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 7:52 pm by Afro Leo
The test for "similarity of marks" under the Sabel v Puma test (as applied) has very little to do with a man in a noisy pub; it simply involves a consideration as to whether there is any level of similarity (as opposed to "likelihood of confusion" - which comes later in the test) between the marks. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 10:06 am by Daithí
In Westminster City Council v Haw [2002] EWHC 2073 (QB), Mr. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:42 am by Andrew Trask
King Architectural Metals, 637 F.3d 721 (7th Cir. 2011). [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 7:57 am by Erin Miller
Paul Kane and Amy Goldstein report at the Washington Post that Kagan is likely to be confirmed with little Republican support — and possibly without a vote from Democrat Arlen Specter. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 4:44 pm by Richard Primus
  George II had little interest in that last little endeavor, being much more focused on Europe, but the Crown’s disinterest didn’t matter much, because the Ministers in Parliament were driving. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 1:05 am
There is little disagreement that the Mickey Marks are famous since Mickey Mouse is one of the most recognized cartoon characters of all time. [read post]