Search for: "Lowe v. Lowe" Results 341 - 360 of 15,415
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2024, 6:44 am by INFORRM
  Each of the 53 plaintiffs was awarded general damages, in amounts ranging from a high of $90,000 to a low of $55,000 depending on their individual circumstances. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
On habeas review, the district court held that Smith was intellectually disabled, noting among other things that because his 72 score had a 3-point margin of error, his IQ could be as low as 69. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:47 am by Dan Bressler
” “Zappia attempted to make the case that Skadden’s conflict of interest compromised its independence and had a deleterious impact on its approach to Myovant and its shareholders, and that it therefore influenced the special committee to accept a low price for the merger and to refrain from soliciting other potential purchasers. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 6:22 am by Jocelyn Bosse
Yang analysed the recent judgment in Optis v Apple Trial E (one of six related trials), which focuses on the terms of a FRAND licence and the conduct of the parties in the negotiations.Marcel Pemsel reviewed the new book by Pierre Heuzé, written in French, entitled L'épuisement des droits de propriété intellectuelle sur un matériel biologique en droit suisse [Exhaustion of intellectual property rights in biological material under Swiss law]. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
Supreme Court’s imprimatur in Village of Euclid v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 8:32 am by Amichai Cohen
Accordingly, regardless of whether South Africa could meet the low threshold required at the jurisdictional stage (The Gambia v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 3:01 pm by Amy Howe
” The Roberts report did not address several of the issues that the Supreme Court specifically faced in 2023, such as the news reports about some justices’ failures to include luxury travel and other gifts on their financial disclosures or the court’s inability to identify the source of the leaked opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]