Search for: "MARRIAGE OF BAKER"
Results 341 - 360
of 709
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2018, 1:10 pm
On July 3, 2018, Governor Baker signed a law permitting a court to order firearms and other weapons to be taken away from a licensed individual who “poses a risk of causing bodily injury to self or others” for any reason. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 6:48 am
Successes in the campaign for same-sex marriage intensified controversies over whether state anti-discrimination laws should cover bakers, photographers and others who refuse to offer their wedding services to same-sex couples.2. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:19 pm
So do you agree that marriage is a question reserved for the states to decide based on Baker v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm
In 2011, the Obama administration announced that it would no longer defend the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 11:47 am
Hodges, in which the justices struck down state bans on same-sex marriage, to Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, involving a baker in Colorado (he prefers the term “cake artist”) who refused to make a cake for a same-sex couple’s wedding, citing religious objections. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 1:00 pm
Hodges, recognizing a right to same-sex marriage, indicated that religious groups could still “advocate with utmost, sincere conviction that, by divine precepts, same-sex marriage should not be condoned. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
Further, there were state law decisions upholding the right of bakers to refuse to sell cakes containing messages demeaning gay persons or same-sex marriage. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 7:40 am
There is a similar pattern of reactions to the recent Masterpiece Cakeshop decision, in which the Supreme Court ruled against a state effort to force a Colorado baker who objects to gay marriage on religious grounds to prepare a cake for a same-sex wedding celebration. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 2:42 pm
How could the lowly baker be protected where Michelangelo is not?! [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 11:23 am
Judge Smith distinguished Baker on page 8 of his dissent]; and second, that rational basis review is exceedingly deferential. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 4:19 am
In National Journal, Sam Baker previewed next week’s oral arguments in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 7:56 pm
She also applied for marriage licenses in 2007 and 2006, newspaper archives show. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm
I mean only to point out that in Masterpiece there’s even less possibility that anyone would misattribute any views to the business, and that Masterpiece’s services do not require the baker to feign acceptance/celebration of the couple, something might at least arguably be true in a case such as Elane.)It therefore came as something of a surprise, three years later, when the Court requested the record in Masterpiece from the state court, put off decision for… [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm
Nevertheless, over time, gay-rights advocates adopted a strategy of attacking first the Defense of Marriage Act, which prevented the federal government from recognizing marriages of same-sex couples, and then proceeding with a marriage-equality case. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 9:21 am
"WEB-ONLY | Calif. high court refuses to remove proposed ban on gay marriage from ballot"The California Supreme Court, which approved same-sex marriage in a landmark ruling in May, has refused to remove a proposed ban on gay marriage from the state's November ballot. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 7:33 am
Phillips did not want to endorse same-sex marriage by selling a wedding cake to a same-sex couple. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 12:39 pm
"family" and "marriage", are coming under pressure to evolve; to become more inclusive and less exclusive. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 9:08 pm
In 1972, the Supreme Court dismissed an appeal from the ruling of the Minnesota Supreme Court in Baker v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:42 pm
" Because under the rules of the Court then in existence, a decision to not grant appellate review to a state supreme court case counted as a substantive ruling, the argument is that Baker is binding Supreme Court precedent that there is no Federally-protected right that would compel a state to issue a marriage license to a same-sex couple. [read post]
