Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B"
Results 341 - 360
of 3,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
Magistrate Judge Kendall J. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
Magistrate Judge Kendall J. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 5:13 am
This: (a) results in a failure of the Claimant to mitigate its loss; (b) amounts to contributory negligence in relation to the tortious interference claims; and (c) broke the chain of causation/rendered any damage suffered by the Claimant too remote. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am
Under subsection (2), in addition, the issuing authority must consider the following: (a) any family law orders in force in relation to the defendant, or any pending applications for family law orders in relation to the defendant, of which the issuing authority has been informed; (b) the accommodation needs of the protected person; (c) the defendant's criminal record as defined in the Criminal Records (Spent Convictions) Act ; (d) the defendant's previous conduct whether in… [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 1:04 pm
`(j) The term `joint invention' means an invention resulting from the collaboration of inventive endeavors of 2 or more persons working toward the same end and producing an invention by their collective efforts.'. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 11:37 am
`(j) The term `joint invention' means an invention resulting from the collaboration of inventive endeavors of 2 or more persons working toward the same end and producing an invention by their collective efforts.'. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 12:39 pm
`(j) The term `joint invention' means an invention resulting from the collaboration of inventive endeavors of 2 or more persons working toward the same end and producing an invention by their collective efforts.'. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 11:38 am
`(j) The term `joint invention' means an invention resulting from the collaboration of inventive endeavors of 2 or more persons working toward the same end and producing an invention by their collective efforts.'. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 10:04 am
`(j) The term `joint invention' means an invention resulting from the collaboration of inventive endeavors of 2 or more persons working toward the same end and producing an invention by their collective efforts.'. [read post]
1 May 2007, 12:40 pm
`(j) The term `joint invention' means an invention resulting from the collaboration of inventive endeavors of 2 or more persons working toward the same end and producing an invention by their collective efforts.'. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 3:01 am
Representing Appellee: David B. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 3:01 am
Representing Appellee: David B. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
Whilst his judgement is likely to be influential, it is nevertheless striking that another judge took the opposite approach, so the matter cannot be regarded as fully settled, and it is appropriate to analyse his reasoning in at least a little detail. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:26 am
Two recent opinions, the one rendered by AG Wathelet on December 8, 2014, in Gazprom (Case C-536/13), and the other one given by AG Jääskinen, on December 11, 2014, in CDC (Case C-352/13) address the interplay between arbitration and EU law, especially in the context of the Brussels I Regulation. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:38 am
(2) PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM- Section 40122 of title 49, United States Code, is amended– (A) by redesignating subsection (j) as subsection (k); and (B) by inserting after subsection (i) the following: `(j) Transportation Security Administration- Notwithstanding any other provision of this section (including subsection (g)(2)(C)), this section shall be subject to section 7103(a)(2)(vi) and (3)(I) of title 5, United… [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
Scalia, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 6:18 am
Gould IV, David C. [read post]
8 May 2020, 6:57 pm
J. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:33 am
” (Clark, Côté J. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
In this regard the Board points out that this wording of R 36(1) EPC is identical to the wording of the former R 25(1) EPC 1973 and, therefore, the corresponding case law can be taken into account.[6] The present Board agrees with the statement of the Legal Board of Appeal in decision J 18/04 that the term “pending earlier European patent application” in R 25 EPC 1973 did not establish a time limit having a point in time at which the pending status of an application begins and… [read post]
