Search for: "MATTER OF N C F"
Results 341 - 360
of 2,134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
C. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 1:14 pm
" Eldred, 537 U.S. at 219; see also Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 2:01 pm
Roche Holding Ltd., 292 F.3d 361, 374 n.7 (3rd Cir. 2002)). [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 4:29 pm
Section 7(1) provides: 7 (1) In a representation agreement made under this section, an adult may authorize his or her representative to help the adult make decisions, or to make decisions on behalf of the adult, about any or all of the following:(a) the adult's personal care;(b) routine management of the adult's financial affairs, including, subject to the regulations,(i) payment of bills,(ii) receipt and deposit of pension and other income,(iii) … [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:19 pm
Louis N., 206 AD2d 612, 613). [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
Nov. 2, 2004) (“Under Texas law, all FDA-approved prescription drugs are unavoidably unsafe as a matter of law. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
During my recent visit to Columbia Law School, Professor John Coffee shared with me a draft of a short article that later appeared in the New York Law Journal.[1] Coffee’s article assessed the prospects in the U.S. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 5:52 pm
Penguin Books USA, Inc., 109 F.3d 1394, 1403 n.11 (9th Cir. 1997). [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 8:04 am
When the matter came for trial, the woman testified for the State that defendant was the shooter. [read post]
23 May 2007, 8:16 am
Involve subject matter experts (SME) in the service being negotiated iv. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 3:33 pm
Explanatory Reports Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève „Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here) Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève “Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 3:00 am
As to the contempt finding, the Court agreed to review the matter under its certiorari jurisdiction. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:39 pm
TFT, Inc., 199 F.3d 1304, 1307 (Fed. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 2:46 pm
CLS Bank Int’l, 573 U.S. 208, 216 (2014) (quoting Ass’n for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm
., 74 F.4th 1360 (Fed. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 11:37 pm
(f) The date of the personal service, the date of the fax service or the date of receipt of the one-day delivery service, whichever is latest, shall be considered the date of service under (c), (d) and (e) above. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 8:18 am
" Id. at 43, citing Matter of the Application of Lafayette Academy, Inc., 610 F.2d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 1979). [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:41 am
§ 1030(c)(4)(A)(i)(I). [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:55 am
And Rule 17(c)(2) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure states that “[o]n motion made promptly, the court may quash or modify the subpoena if compliance would be unreasonable or oppressive. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 7:45 am
Law § 3420(c)(2)(B). [read post]
